• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Diamond Jubilee Thread

Kill the lot of em and claim the land back. No one will ever tell me tourism in London would be effected one fudging percent if this lot fudged off. Look at bath York and all the other historic places in the uk full of tourists. All due to England's history nowt to do with the royals. Hope everyone enjoyed the rain yesterday!! ;)
 
Scara. Why should we pay rent on land that is ours? Its like a squatter giving you back your house for rent!!!

How far back do you want to go to define ours? Are the Falklands ours? Historically they're not. Does Israel belong to its inhabitants? Not historically, but I can't imagine you disputing either claim.
 
Kill the lot of em and claim the land back. No one will ever tell me tourism in London would be effected one fudging percent if this lot fudged off. Look at bath York and all the other historic places in the uk full of tourists. All due to England's history nowt to do with the royals. Hope everyone enjoyed the rain yesterday!! ;)

Your like a boring stuck record
 
Sorry, should have added:

Once something belongs to someone you have two choices, live with it or forcibly take it.

I don't have the appetite for forcibly taking it, that would make us no better than the French! ;)
 
Sorry, should have added:

Once something belongs to someone you have two choices, live with it or forcibly take it.

I don't have the appetite for forcibly taking it, that would make us no better than the French! ;)

Vive la France! Vive la difference!
 
How far back do you want to go to define ours? Are the Falklands ours? Historically they're not. Does Israel belong to its inhabitants? Not historically, but I can't imagine you disputing either claim.

There are more than enough people who would dispute both claims!

The royals keep our history in the limelight on a global stage.

around 2 billion people were estimated to have tuned in and watched part of the royal wedding.

http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/drama/tv-news/news/two-billion-global-audience-for-royal-wedding/12618

People do not go to France anywhere near the same as they do to England an its history.

The royal family brings a lot of attention for sure but the UK, especially London, Cornwall, Devon etc have a fudgeload to offer without the royal family. France, the US, China, Spain and Italy all have significantly more tourism than the UK. Only one of those have a royal family.

Obviously you cannot simply compare like for like but the UK has enough to offer to be able to still draw in a lot of tourists without the royals. No-one comes to London just to see Buckingham Palace or the Tower of London.

Personally, I'm neutral about them. Couldn't care less if they stay, couldn't care less if they go. But I don't think loving the queen should be a pre-requisite for being patriotic. I can certainly see the argument for removing them.
 
Fantastic concert tonight

Fcuk its great to be British... for the past GHod knows how long I've felt cocooned into something without a voice.

But tonight fudge I feel British. A call for Great British day, once a year remind everyone how fooking great we fooking are.
 
Would be good if the Rolling Stones played, but more likely to be Take That.

Madness with the projector on Buckingham Palace is great... lol at turning it into a row of terrace housing.
 
Really... Paul McCartney!

What a poor finish

Not his biggest fan.

It will be crap songs (imo) until he sings hey jude and everyone will then join in
 
Last edited:
Back