• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Tim Sherwood…gone \o/

Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?


  • Total voters
    125
  • Poll closed .
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

They're not objective because they ignore so many factors.

Using Statto's logic I could claim that Lloris is the best keeper to ever exist because of yesterday's 100% save ratio, or that Rose is the world's greatest striker because of his 100% goals to shots ratio.

It's not one game though is it? It's 20 and it's being compared to the 20 games played by all of the other PL sides in the same time period.
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

using the same 20 game period last season and again for the season prior would have meant we'd have been looking at AVB and Redknapp as Champions elect and mid table also rans respectively - rarely do these small sample sizes give a true reflection of the greater picture.

especially for a new guy coming in mid way through a season as you can point to many factors which see an initial upturn in results. in Sherwoods case it was a releasing of the shackles of the previous manager and re introducing a marginalized striker who had a point to prove etc you'd be very naive to base any serious thought on such circumstances without taking such things in to account.
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

They're not objective because they ignore so many factors.

Using Statto's logic I could claim that Lloris is the best keeper to ever exist because of yesterday's 100% save ratio, or that Rose is the world's greatest striker because of his 100% goals to shots ratio.

Quite. Sherwood is also operating with a different squad of players, with a different wages budget, in a different era to say, Gerry Francis or George Graham.

The amount of variables is just too immense to give these stats even an ounce of credibility.

Would Sherwood have the best % of all Tottenham managers in the universe ever if he was managing the likes of Ruel Fox, Gary Doherty and Stuart Nethercott? I think not. Comparisons to last seasons results are also meaningless: the premier league has changed, players have moved clubs and it consists of different teams.

The stats that are relevant to any Tim Sherwood argument, are progressive, cumulative stats compiled throughout his own reign at Spurs; and these will only serve to illuminate trends of his tenureship. Even then they don't account for days like yesterday, where one of the most inept managerial performances you are likely to see hampered our efforts.

Hence, I base (and always will) my opinion on what I see on the pitch. Otherwise, based on a sample of yesterday's game like Scara says - all we have to do is cross from the right, get Rose in the box, and we'll have the deadliest left back to ever have played the game. Every time Ade crosses to Rose when he is isolated with his marker we score. If we can do that 4 or 5 times every game we'll win the league.

We should base our whole attacking philosophy around Ade cross to Rose.
 
Last edited:
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

How about AVB's stats with a settled teams vs Timmeh's?

Well arguably Tim having come in half way through a season hasn't had settled team just as avb didn't this season.

So how about Avbs record without the third best player in world vs sherwood a without the third best player in the world?
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

I think that is one of the few reasoned and thought out responses as to why tactically Tim maybe should be replaced, however when bemoaning the fact that we were outplayed in the second half against Stoke, you have to take in to account that bar Liverpool over the last 8 games stoke are the team in the best form in the league, they had just won the last four of their previous home games, they have had some great results at home and excluding an early season blib to Norwich they only other team to beat them at home were Liverpool who were in fact lucky to do so.... In addition based on the sky highlights up to their sending off we were by far the better team (and started fast this time), not sure why we couldn't control the game better after the sending off but think it could be down to the fact that their blood was up and they they fans right behind them at what they perceived was a injustice (it wasn't).

Somewhere around the 40th minute of the first half, I actually - honestly - asked myself whether my criticism of Sherwood was OTT; his selections were not my cup of tea but, hey, we were winning at Stoke (a team bang in form) and we were actually dominating the game (even though we weren't exactly leaving Begovic breathless). Boy did I lose that uncertainty by the end! It's not that Stoke dominated us with 10 men but the fact that his attempts at correcting it were totally ineffective. Siggy for Chadli?? What was that about? I can guess where he was coming from: "let me send in a goal scoring midfielder to get the second goal that will kill the game" when the problem was that we had relinquished midfield and needed a passer (Bentaleb) to try to wrestle the control back. Then Townsend for Lennon - again WTF? Even if Lennon was not particularly effective his covering is eons better than Townsend's...
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

Well arguably Tim having come in half way through a season hasn't had settled team just as avb didn't this season.

So how about Avbs record without the third best player in world vs sherwood a without the third best player in the world?

well that isn't accurate either.

how about Sherwoods first 20 games V Redknapp/Jol/Ramos' first 20 ? all three coming in after a season had started and with a side 'playing below itself'
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

well that isn't accurate either.

how about Sherwoods first 20 games V Redknapp/Jol/Ramos' first 20 ? all three coming in after a season had started and with a side 'playing below itself'

Sherwood would still win it by a country mile.

And then some.
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

well that isn't accurate either.

how about Sherwoods first 20 games V Redknapp/Jol/Ramos' first 20 ? all three coming in after a season had started and with a side 'playing below itself'

Yeah sure, I think Sherwood comes out on top of that list, stato to check?
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

Lies, damned lies and statistics...

Sampling size is the most important attribute in achieving a statistically significant end point and Sherwood has not been in charge for enough games to make proper analyses.
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

Sherwood would still win it by a country mile.

And then some.


let's see the stats then Statto ;)

no doubt he would have as he has taken over from a better starting position - but it'd be interesting to see what each of those 3 managers ppg was over their first 20 games V the rest of their times at the club. would go someway to prove that the first 20 games in charge is a fairly poor sample size to make any kind of accurate judgment.


seeings as you're someone who lives by his stats i guess that makes Sherwood our greatest ever manager?
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

Lies, damned lies and statistics...

Sampling size is the most important attribute in achieving a statistically significant end point and Sherwood has not been in charge for enough games to make proper analyses.

I agree that sample size is to small, but at what stage does it not become to small?
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

let's see the stats then Statto ;)

no doubt he would have as he has taken over from a better starting position - but it'd be interesting to see what each of those 3 managers ppg was over their first 20 games V the rest of their times at the club

I agree that would be interesting
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

Ok then let's give Tim a full season and then see ;)

It'll be too late then.

You don't need stats to see that he's a punchy, half-witted little Englander with no respect for/from our club.
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

Lies, damned lies and statistics...

Sampling size is the most important attribute in achieving a statistically significant end point and Sherwood has not been in charge for enough games to make proper analyses.

How about Tony Pulis then? He's been in charge of Palace for 23 games(three more than Sherwood), does he deserve no credit for what he's done at Palace then? Too small a sample size? There's nothing to say Holloway wouldn't have done the same or better? When does the sample size become relevant? Also when did AVB's unsettled team become settled? Let me guess, right after he was sacked?

Look, I don't want Tim next season either but you lot are funny, you staunchly defend your side of the argument and will reject anything thrown at you. Are there any reasonably objective posters on here? Are there any others on here like me who don't want Tim for various reasons but at the same time can give him credit for him statistically having us as the 4th best side since he took over? Why does being against Sherwood mean we have to be pro AVB? Can't we see the good and bad in both? No, ok, carry on then.
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

How about Tony Pulis then? He's been in charge of Palace for 23 games(three more than Sherwood), does he deserve no credit for what he's done at Palace then? Too small a sample size? There's nothing to say Holloway wouldn't have done the same or better? When does the sample size become relevant? Also when did AVB's unsettled team become settled? Let me guess, right after he was sacked?

Look, I don't want Tim next season either but you lot are funny, you staunchly defend your side of the argument and will reject anything thrown at you. Are there any reasonably objective posters on here? Are there any others on here like me who don't want Tim for various reasons but at the same time can give him credit for him statistically having us as the 4th best side since he took over? Why does being against Sherwood mean we have to be pro AVB? Can't we see the good and bad in both? No, ok, carry on then.

Pulis can be regarded as good/excellent at what he does because he's done it before. All he's doing at Palace is continuing the same excellent (evil) work he was doing at Stoke.

You can't say that for Timmeh unless you know how good the tea he made Levy was and how neat the paperwork on the loans to Swindon deals were.
 
Re: Do you want Tim Sherwood to stay as manager?

How about Tony Pulis then? He's been in charge of Palace for 23 games(three more than Sherwood), does he deserve no credit for what he's done at Palace then? Too small a sample size? There's nothing to say Holloway wouldn't have done the same or better? When does the sample size become relevant? Also when did AVB's unsettled team become settled? Let me guess, right after he was sacked?

Look, I don't want Tim next season either but you lot are funny, you staunchly defend your side of the argument and will reject anything thrown at you. Are there any reasonably objective posters on here? Are there any others on here like me who don't want Tim for various reasons but at the same time can give him credit for him statistically having us as the 4th best side since he took over? Why does being against Sherwood mean we have to be pro AVB? Can't we see the good and bad in both? No, ok, carry on then.


asides from a select few i think most people think his ppg at Spurs is very good, the debate as far as i see it isn't 'has he done well here?' - it's 'is he good enough to get the job going in to next season?' - and to answer that question you have to look way beyond a 20 game ppg stat
 
Back