• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

All aboard the Alex Scott hype train

Absolutely, which is what we seem to have done with Raya and that sends a message to the other clubs on the list, i.e. we aren't going to dither and fudge around (like we did in the past)
This is a good thing indeed. No point battling and battling to reduce a price that is not going to fall to an acceptable level. Move on and find an alternative target which if you believe the various reports we have done.

Sent from my XQ-BC72 using Fapatalk
 
Reports this morning that Maddison is all in on Spurs because of London so Saudi Sportswashing Machine no longer in the running.

West Ham could be a problem as soon they will be flush with cash when Rice joins Emirates Marketing Project.

Just because he prefers the nightclubs down here, I think we've shown with Reya that we won't overpay and will walk, whereas Saudi Sportswashing Machine definitely will overpay.
 
Just because he prefers the nightclubs down here, I think we've shown with Reya that we won't overpay and will walk, whereas Saudi Sportswashing Machine definitely will overpay.

They are signing other players.

The Maddison price will fall on deadline drastically as Leicester (already in a perilous financial position) get desperate.
 
this is the kind of investment/risk we should be making if we are seriously trying to rebuild. however I guess we seriously need to start making decisions on past investments on loans now
 
this is the kind of investment/risk we should be making if we are seriously trying to rebuild. however I guess we seriously need to start making decisions on past investments on loans now

Think its just prioritisation. Next two priority signings are CBs. These are critical.

If there's cash left after that, then I think you then start to look at a new number 6, a back-up RW to Kulu (if Porro is viewed as a RB) plus ones for the future, like Scott
 
Think its just prioritisation. Next two priority signings are CBs. These are critical.

If there's cash left after that, then I think you then start to look at a new number 6, a back-up RW to Kulu (if Porro is viewed as a RB) plus ones for the future, like Scott
The odds of Porro being viewed as a RB are literally zero. The guy is not a good defender at all, and we have a very good RB in Royal and another very good potential one in Spence - the exact kind of player Ange is keen to develop.

As for Scott you also have to consider other teams interest in him, West Ham have apparently spoken to his representatives and if they or others firm up their bids our hand might be forced if we do actually want him. This is the crazy world of a transfer window, it's not as black and white as just prioritising with a nice little timetable set out - you have to be flexible....
 
The odds of Porro being viewed as a RB are literally zero. The guy is not a good defender at all, and we have a very good RB in Royal and another very good potential one in Spence - the exact kind of player Ange is keen to develop.

As for Scott you also have to consider other teams interest in him, West Ham have apparently spoken to his representatives and if they or others firm up their bids our hand might be forced if we do actually want him. This is the crazy world of a transfer window, it's not as black and white as just prioritising with a nice little timetable set out - you have to be flexible....

Let's see about Porro. I think he's more of a winger but other's dont.

re prioritisation I agree about not progressing things in a heavil prescribed manner, but CBs are absolutely critical. You and I dont know what we have available to spend - if there's clearly the ability to sign CBs as well as other positions, then ordering makes no difference. If the financing is tighter, then we should clearly go for priorities first
 
Back