Tottenham Hotspur Stadium - Licence To Stand

[Spur of the moment]

The man from Del Monte, he say YES!

http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...approval-to-spurs-redevelopment-a3189306.html

 

[K.D.D.D.D.Soc]

Did you see how much the lovvies round there kicked off when they were going to build one crossrail station. I just can not believe Chelsea will get quick approval if they do it will be more proof to be that the prem is corrupt pretty much thought it was ever since the last game of the season when we tried to get the west ham game postponed but the league doctor would not leave his exec box at highbury.

Did you see how much the lovvies round there kicked off when they were going to build one crossrail station. I just can not believe Chelsea will get quick approval if they do it will be more proof to be that the prem is corrupt pretty much thought it was ever since the last game of the season when we tried to get the west ham game postponed but the league doctor would not leave his exec box at highbury.

I've read that somewhere else recently

 

[DubaiSpur]

Apparently even now, once we have signed the 106 forms with the Council, someone could theoretically apply for a Judicial review

I'm all seriousness, this. Could someone pull an Archway and force the process back further?

 

[paxtonwolf]

I'm all seriousness, this. Could someone pull an Archway and force the process back further?

Secretly funded by a Russian billionaire who owns a Club not too far from here....

 

[DubaiSpur]

Secretly funded by a Russian billionaire who owns a Club not too far from here....

No shortage of candidates, really.

 

[paxtonwolf]

No shortage of candidates, really.

Is that Gomez from The Addams Family??

 

[AdamB]

Apparently even now, once we have signed the 106 forms with the Council, someone could theoretically apply for a Judicial review

Presumably though for someone to do that, they would need to have some new information which hadn't previously been considered, or new reason why it shouldn't be allowed. A judicial review would simply happen just because, for example, some Arsenal fan wanted to delay it without any basis

 

[milo]

Presumably though for someone to do that, they would need to have some new information which hadn't previously been considered, or new reason why it shouldn't be allowed. A judicial review would simply happen just because, for example, some Arsenal fan wanted to delay it without any basis

A judicial review is a review of the decision or how it has been reached. So you would need to demonstrate that the mayor or Haringey council had acted illegally. That is quite a high bar.

 

[lurker of old]

Agreed, I don't think it is likely, even from English Heritage, but theoretically possible

 

[Greg]

Apparently even now, once we have signed the 106 forms with the Council, someone could theoretically apply for a Judicial review

Every decision made by a public body is potentially susceptible to judicial review but such a challenge can only be on grounds of administrative error in terms of the lawfulness of the decision made. I wouldn't worry about it too much, in terms of planning decisions a claim must be brought within six weeks of a decision, for all other decisions there is a three month window. The JR period isn't an impediment to starting any work but there is some inherent risk until the period has passed.

 

[K.D.D.D.D.Soc]

No shortage of candidates, really.

Is the bottom picture from a production of "The Producers" as it certainly looks like Max Bialystock and Leo Bloom

 

[AjaxDeSuperYids]

The only potential judicial review is from EH on the derelict buildings.

Even if they submit one we won't need to down tools while we wait the several months for the court date, where their case would be laughed at and promptly thrown out.

When the basis for your decision is an independent body concluding that the retention of the buildings puts lives at risk, then that is that.

 

[Gutter Boy]

The only potential judicial review is from EH on the derelict buildings.

Even if they submit one we won't need to down tools while we wait the several months for the court date, where their case would be laughed at and promptly thrown out.

When the basis for your decision is an independent body concluding that the retention of the buildings puts lives at risk, then that is that.

So we can sign the S106 on Monday and then TNT the buildings straight away?

 

[AjaxDeSuperYids]

So we can sign the S106 on Monday and then TNT the buildings straight away?

No idea mate but I don't see the urgency as their not blocking any of the works for the feesible future

 

[hamer]

No idea mate but I don't see the urgency as their not blocking any of the works for the feesible future

To avoid any hypothetical legal challenges in the future. As soon as permission is in place they should go. Excuse is the same as in the proposal, public safety.

 

[Gutter Boy]

To avoid any hypothetical legal challenges in the future. As soon as permission is in place they should go. Excuse is the same as in the proposal, public safety.

We pay business rates on them while they are standing too

 

[scaramanga]

We pay business rates on them while they are standing too

A negligible amount if they're not in use.

 

[Bedfordspurs]

We pay business rates on them while they are standing too

We will have out boxes in the corners and then their rated as storage and much much lower rates

If we haven't then the consultants were so employing want shooting

 

[Gutter Boy]

Here is Boris' full letter: http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/AttachmentShowServlet?ImageName=798138

 

[awesome dawson]

Here is Boris' full letter: http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/AttachmentShowServlet?ImageName=798138

Having read that entire load of bureaucratic tripe, it seems to me that on the subject of those High Road heritage listed buildings, English Heritage will continue to challenge this decision in the courts.

The s106 must be pre-prepared and needs to be signed before 18 March. What happens now?