Biased BBC

[southstand1882]

More classic BBC:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18135042

The BBC's Paul Adams at Camp David says both that communique and Mr Obama's speech showed the US and French position had won out over Germany and Britain's pro-austerity stance.

They decided not to report the facts:

US National Debt 2008 $10,699,804,612,604
US National Debt 2012 $15,125,898,976,397

”We will cut the debt in half by the end of my first term.”, Obama (2008.) :ross:

The BBC are sticking with Hollande's genius public sector spending "growth" (more fudging debt/public sector spending) plans instead

 

[Gilzeantoscore]

In the absence of any credible response?

?

 

[Leeds Spur]

?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Todays example.......Cameron is the British Prime Minister FFS!! Now they're caning him for giving the kraut some stick?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Quite sad.

Taking off my Spurs glasses I can see how neurtrals were enthralled and wanted the Chelsea scum to win.

 

[Danishfurniturelover]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Todays example.......Cameron is the British Prime Minister FFS!! Now they're caning him for giving the kraut some stick?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Quite sad.

Taking off my Spurs glasses I can see how neurtrals were enthralled and wanted the Chelsea scum to win.

I would never had wanted chelsea to win them or Emirates Marketing Project do not deserve anything. When arsenal got to their final against barcelona they deserved it more then the two oil clubs.

As for the BBC im not even sure how much the fee is a year it just comes straight out in a direct debit in january, but with money being tight i imagine the are a lot of people who would rather keep 150 quid then watch bbc, it is unfair to make someone pay for something they do not want to watch.

If as a football fan tottenham suddenly started charging me money for the local cricket club i would be fudging furious.

 

[southstand1882]

Some excellent evidence provided by those on the right.

I've yet to see any "right wing" articles posted by those on the left.

Have we won the debate?

 

[parklane1]

Some excellent evidence provided by those on the right.

I've yet to see any "right wing" articles posted by those on the left.

Have we won the debate?

Never realized this was a debate.

 

[southstand1882]

Never realized this was a debate.

I encourage this to be a mass debate, like the Labour thread.

 

[parklane1]

I encourage this to be a mass debate, like the Labour thread.

It would be good, unfortuatly there are too many with agendas and closed minds to anything that they disagree with.

 

[Leeds Spur]

Lol......I'm open to the labour slagging articles from the BBC. But ther aren't any!!

 

[Yossarian]

Anyone who thinks that the BBC isn't outrageously biased in favour of Labour needs to (re)read 1984.

 

[Yossarian]

Indeed it's so biased there is even has a website dedicated to pointing it out, from which, this gem...

http://biased-bbc.com/2012/05/21/cleaning-out-the-augean-stables/

 

[yiddo2786]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Todays example.......Cameron is the British Prime Minister FFS!! Now they're caning him for giving the kraut some stick?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18144783

Quite sad.

Taking off my Spurs glasses I can see how neurtrals were enthralled and wanted the Chelsea scum to win.

 

[Leeds Spur]

Lol! I know! How much research did the article take? Monumental waste of time!

 

[parklane1]

Indeed it's so biased there is even has a website dedicated to pointing it out, from which, this gem...

http://biased-bbc.com/2012/05/21/cleaning-out-the-augean-stables/

Are yes good old Terry Smith, no agendas from him is there

 

[Yossarian]

Are yes good old Terry Smith, no agendas from him is there

Clearly fighting fire with fire!

 

[Richie]

Biased BBC ... i think the problem most people have in this thread is the fact it is not biased towards their party.

Gotta be honest, I disagree with this. I have no problem with a news medium being biased, as long as they don't claim to be unbiased at the same time. For example I have no problem with the Guardian being left wing, because it is openly so. The same for the Telegraph and being right wing.

Personally I'm not sure if the BBC is as biased as some of the posters in here think but I really only read the sports pages anyway

 

[parklane1]

Gotta be honest, I disagree with this. I have no problem with a news medium being biased, as long as they don't claim to be unbiased at the same time. For example I have no problem with the Guardian being left wing, because it is openly so. The same for the Telegraph and being right wing.

Personally I'm not sure if the BBC is as biased as some of the posters in here think but I really only read the sports pages anyway

As i have said earlier all news agency have a bias and agenda, it depends on what the individuals own agenda and bias is which pushes for one and against the other

 

[Leeds Spur]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18158470

OH brick!!!!! The IMF agrees with Osbourne!!! Quick, discredit and smear......lets see what Labour have to say!!

fudge!!! I don't have my brief from the Labour Central Office!!!!!!

 

[WookieD]

Am I reading that wrong. It reads like Nick Robinson is desperately looking for the negatives on Labours behalf?!

 

[Yossarian]

As i have said earlier all news agency have a bias and agenda, it depends on what the individuals own agenda and bias is which pushes for one and against the other

Wilfully missing the point again. No other organisation forces you to fund them, under pain of imprisonment, whether you watch/read their output or not.