• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** OMT - Tottenham Hotspur VS Some Gauche Middle Eastern Oil Money ***

Aurier would have done much, much, much better. Poch knew this too. But he didn't make the change, because being proven wrong clearly unsettles him more than I had expected it to. Which is *wrong*.

This is the most incredible piece of knee-jerk on here, and there is some competition! Firstly, I love the claim that one of knows what is in Poch's head and thats only marginally surpassed by teh suggestion that Poch wouldnt do something which he thought was right for the team. Incredible....
 
And every other team has done well have they?!? It was 16 wins from 17 for them before today so it hardly suggests that a defensive set-up against them works well does it?!?

The formation today made sense - our back 4 against their front 3, Dembele and Winks could take de Bruyne and Gundogan and then Eriksen drop in on their holding midfielder. The only thing I didnt get was never going long to Kane
And what was the score with what they did? We have better defenders than West Ham and so I’d think we were more likely to get something from playing the same way than they are....
 
Did West Ham get tonked 4-1? Did Stoke get tonked 4-1? Did United get tonked 4-1?

If we hadnt left someone unmarked from a corner then we'd have got to the hour mark 0-0, which against them is a success and it might have been very different. Fine margins etc. Today's game was, in my mind, a bonus and i never expected to get anything out of it - next 4 games are far more important
 
They *can* replace Aguero with Jesus. They *have* good players. Both are true, but they are also utterly irrelevant given that we *can* also replace our players with players just as good in some cases, and have good players ourselves. We *can* replace Son with Lamela. We *can* replace Rose with Davies. We *can* replace Trippier with Aurier (and bloody should have). That is irrelevant. In this individual game, they went into it with injuries as serious as our own, with no easy replacements available.



Mangala was crap, and everyone knew it and knows it. Everyone who saw him at Valencia last season is abundantly aware of this - if price is the marker by which a footballer is good, then Sissoko is world-class. City were in crisis when Stones went down and Kompany broke down again - the fact that they want to buy a centre-back in January proves that they know this as well. Their defence is not at all their first-choice one, and it was much weaker than what their best defense would have looked like.

Didn't matter. They adapted tactically so that their loss wasn't felt *at all* in this game. We couldn't do the same in *any* way.



Would have, would have, would have. Trippier was *destroyed* today - League 2 man with a bit of pace would have done streets better than he did. One ball in behind, and he was gone, a non-entity, completely taken out of the game - and everyone saw this happen fifty f*cking times throughout the game, including for *three* of their four goals.

This wasn't hypothetical - this happened. Aurier would have done much, much, much better. Poch knew this too. But he didn't make the change, because being proven wrong clearly unsettles him more than I had expected it to. Which is *wrong*.

We have covered losses too in previous seasons. This season has caught us in a perfect storm of long term injuries just coming back and others being out long term. We cannot cope and we cannot build momentum.

Mangala has improved massively under Guardiola. He was brilliant on one on one's today. They also had fernandinho holding well, breaking up play, our Victor Wanyama.

I don't disagree with Tripper not being up to it. I said it at the start of the season we shouldn't have sold Walker, because Aurier, as good as he can be, is not the answer yet. He is too reckless.
 
Last edited:
Well there's no doubt about that loss, we were thoroughly outplayed for most of the match. City really is an impressive team this season, and I have no doubt they will win the league. Possibly undefeated too.

Would be interesting to see how Pochettino's Spurs would fare against this team if we too had unlimited funds. Somehow I don't think the game would be that one sided.

That said, kudos to City for a great performance. Money well spent.

I do however think we would've been more of a threat to them with a fully fit Wanyama and Alderweireld playing. Winks had an absolute mare, and we sorely missed Toby's leadership at the back. We didn't threaten them much at all going forward, but with a stronger defensive unit I think we could've been braver and more adventurous in attack.

Our passing was woeful at times though. Key passes went astray, good shooting opportunities ended up in row Z and our movement was simply not good enough. Dele, Eriksen, Kane and Son were mostly poor. Rose was fired up, and did some good stuff, but still looks rusty. Same for Dembele, but I think him, Hugo and Vertonghen were the least bad players. Trippier and Dier at times pretty ok too.

On another note; I used to think De Bruyne was a great player and a decent fella, but I don’t know where I got that last bit from. He's such a penis. From the inaginary card waving after a perfectly ordinary foul in the fourth minute, to the dirty tackles and constant complaints to the ref...well, he is still great, but I certainly lost all respect for him today. Thunderclam.

Oh well. Most difficult game of the season over. This isn't where top four is decided. Give me a fully fit and firing side when we face them on Wembley, and I think we'll cause them more problems than they like.

...unless, of course, they spend big again in January, and fill their bench with more multimillion pound superstars than we can possibly match. Which is the centre of their winning formula after all.
 
Did West Ham get tonked 4-1? Did Stoke get tonked 4-1? Did United get tonked 4-1?
So what? They all lost. Can we be better? sure. We are not having a great season so far. But I believe we have mitigating factors which I have already outlined. We need to build some momentum which just seems very difficult at the moment. Bloody Hell you make football management out to be so easy.
 
The more I see of us this season, injury issues notwithstanding, I'm starting to wonder whether this group shot their bolt with the title challenges of the past two seasons. They look very jaded to me.
 
We have covered losses too in previous seasons. This season has caught us in a perfect storm of long term injuries just coming back and others being out long term. We cannot cope and we cannot build momentum.

Mangala has improved massively under Guardiola. He was brilliant on one on one's today. They also had fernandinho holding well, breaking up play, our Victor Wanyama.

You're not getting my point, or maybe I'm not putting it across well enough. Mangala has been improved by Guardiola, but not individually - I would argue he is the same player, but that the tactics around him are making him a lot better. He isn't left exposed, he can go into challenges confident that Otamendi, Walker, De Bruyne et all will drop back to help, he can focus on the positive bits of his game (his physicality, more or less) over his shortcomings because Guardiola tailors his tactics to his weaknesses.

I'm not sure how to tailor our tactics to the weakness of Dier and Verts losing half a brain each when Toby isn't around, but Poch hasn't been able to do that in any significant way this season - not at all. And if they had Fernandinho while we are lacking Wanyama, we had Rose while they are lacking *any* left back at all - it is at least as much of a tactical weakness on their part. But Guardiola worked around it expertly, while Poch hasn't been able to do so. This wasn't their best eleven against our weakest eleven, it was two depleted elevens but with one tactically sound and able to cover for their weaknesses, while the other floundered and looked utterly brainless.

I don't disagree with Tripper not being up to it. I said it at the start of the season we shouldn't have sold Walker, because Aurier, as good as he can be, is not the answer yet. He is too reckless.

I said it too. Trippier is not Walker. We would be weaker for his sale, and so it is proving. But Aurier is better than Trippier - and much more suited to days like today, when our wing-backs are required to defend huge stretches of space by themselves. Trippier is *useless* in that situation - not quick enough to get forward or get back, not physical enough to even face Sane, never mind the rest of their team, and not technical enough to evade their press, *despite* his skill on the ball. He is useless. That was clear at half time. Poch knew this. He changed nothing.

Aurier *would have* done much, much better. If your hypothetical is that he would have given away a pen, I still would take that over giving away three goals in *total* down the right-hand side.

So what? They all lost. Can we be better? sure. We are not having a great season so far. But I believe we have mitigating factors which I have already outlined. We need to build some momentum which just seems very difficult at the moment. Bloody Hell you make football management out to be so easy.

So what? Christ, we imploded entirely due to a tactical disaster and the response is 'well, the other teams lost too.' Yes, but they weren't embarassed like we were - sent packing like we were, made to look like bumbling fools like we were.

It would *absolutely* have been that easy to prevent this by fixing the yawning problem down our right, which any and *every* fool could see throughout the game.
 
So what? They all lost. Can we be better? sure. We are not having a great season so far. But I believe we have mitigating factors which I have already outlined. We need to build some momentum which just seems very difficult at the moment. Bloody Hell you make football management out to be so easy.
Yes they lost but they didn’t get thumped like we did. We are a better defensive unit than those teams, we would be harder break down than those teams. To come and play as we did so open against a team who press better and play better football is just suicidal. It didn’t look like we adapted our plans at all from what a standard PL fixture would be and against that City team is criminal....
 
The more I see of us this season, injury issues notwithstanding, I'm starting to wonder whether this group shot their bolt with the title challenges of the past two seasons. They look very jaded to me.
Isn't it Poch's job to revive the jaded squad?
 
Pep can’t afford any expensive mistakes this season, he has to win the league this season and he is doing so in style. I remember some saying at start of this season Pep isn’t a better coach than Poch - I love Poch but do me a favour....
Give Poch £1B and I bet my house he'd win the league in style too.

In fact, given what they've spent since they turned on cheat mode, City should be winning the league every season by 10+ points. They should also be winning at least one cup and be in the final 4 of the CL every season.

Anything less would be a big failure.
 
. But he didn't make the change, because being proven wrong clearly unsettles him more than I had expected it to. Which is *wrong*.
It's great to have mind-readers on this board to help us lesser humans make sense of things that we don't fully understand.
 
The more I see of us this season, injury issues notwithstanding, I'm starting to wonder whether this group shot their bolt with the title challenges of the past two seasons. They look very jaded to me.

Sell all the squad and start again from scratch?!? Wow! The reaction on here keeps getting better....
 
Yes they lost but they didn’t get thumped like we did. We are a better defensive unit than those teams, we would be harder break down than those teams. To come and play as we did so open against a team who press better and play better football is just suicidal. It didn’t look like we adapted our plans at all from what a standard PL fixture would be and against that City team is criminal....
Genuinely mate I think we were hamstrung today by the players unavailable. No sanchez no Alderweireld meant we could not play 3 at the back as we did against Madrid. Dier is not good enough in a back 4. No wanyama to protect the back 4, Rose's form is not up to what it has been previous to his injury, I believe Poch thought the best tactic would be to take the game to City. It's just they were so good and we were not good enough. Seriously don't think Aurier was the difference today.
 
I didn't expect much from the game, more hope than expectation, but we were still disappointing. Giving them such an easy start from the corner just set the tone.

I didn't think any of our players were awful all game except Dembele -- his performance was borderline cowardly imo, he really did nothing to try and get hold of the midfield, or drive forward with the ball, or protect the back four... it felt like he was hiding. Really disappointed with him. Winks struggled too, but a player of his inexperience should be getting a bit more help from the senior partner.

None of our players played particularly well, Rose and Vertonghen were among the better ones and even they weren't that great. Eriksen scored a nice goal.

Overall, the game doesn't change a lot. We're still miles behind City, we're still playing for a top 4 spot. Hopefully, the next time we play them we have more fit defensive players and try to make a proper go of playing them on the counter attack, more like we did when we played Liverpool.

Let's have a good response away to Burnley.
 
Back