LOL @ Colin Little.
The fvck does he think they are? Real Madrid? They're a smaller club than West Ham FFS.
They're the team who own him and are refusing to sell him fair play to them I say.
LOL @ Colin Little.
The fvck does he think they are? Real Madrid? They're a smaller club than West Ham FFS.
They're the team who own him and are refusing to sell him fair play to them I say.
Southampton manager Ronald Koeman told Sky Sports News: "The situation is difficult, because the player makes it difficult and I spoke to Morgan with our chairman and the situation has not changed. We don't sell Schneiderlin and he has to accept that. He's not in the squad tomorrow because he said he's not in a physical but even more not in a mental way prepared for tomorrow. On one side I can understand that."
They sound pretty adamant that he won't be sold, similar situaton to Modric before knuckling down for the 11/12 season. Schneiderlin might miss the first 2-3 games but he won't want to miss any more after that assuming he's still there.
Small time club. I live here. They are small time.
Nice club. Nice fans. But small time.
Until he refuses to play a part in their sudden drop back to their level. Or does a Defoe and keeps getting sent off.
It works both ways - if we have to sell players to bigger clubs (and I believe we do) then so do they.
Because the players simply won't play if we don't sell them. Apart from the fact that they are then 6 months nearer the end of their contract at the next window, their value is massively decreased by the fact that other clubs know you have an asset you can't use.Id be very interested to know why you believe we HAVE to sell?
Because the players simply won't play if we don't sell them. Apart from the fact that they are then 6 months nearer the end of their contract at the next window, their value is massively decreased by the fact that other clubs know you have an asset you can't use.
There's also the suggestion from employment lawyers that keeping a player against their will could end up with us losing them in court anyway.
Also, what player with a bright future joins a club known for refusing transfers and holding them captive in their contracts?
Because the players simply won't play if we don't sell them. Apart from the fact that they are then 6 months nearer the end of their contract at the next window, their value is massively decreased by the fact that other clubs know you have an asset you can't use.
There's also the suggestion from employment lawyers that keeping a player against their will could end up with us losing them in court anyway.
Also, what player with a bright future joins a club known for refusing transfers and holding them captive in their contracts?
The thing we need to worry about is not whether or not Southampton will sell after stating they won't, it's that Levy will smell a further bargaining chip to lower the price some more. If this happens right at the death it will be because of Levy pushing it to then not Southampton.
imo.
I don't think that we should pay any price that they name. If they are over valuing him, we should try to get the price down.