• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Redknapp Vs AVB vs Jol

Your favorite recent (successful) manager

  • Jol

    Votes: 24 28.6%
  • Redknapp

    Votes: 12 14.3%
  • AVB

    Votes: 48 57.1%

  • Total voters
    84
who is doing that in here then Mr Knight?

I've seen a lot of people here be selective with what they believe from the media. I've seen a lot of people be selective in all walks of life from what they believe in the media. You often see people post a media article and claim it to be a good article. What they are really meaning, is that it's an article they agree with. Good or bad doesn't come into it.

Mr Knight? I have never claimed to be knighted, so I am not sure of the reference?
 
I've seen a lot of people here be selective with what they believe from the media

as have i

personally i believe quotes when they are direct from the horses mouth, of which there are many from Redknapp who wasn't exactly shy about broadcasting his/our interest in players - which is what the discussion at hand was about when you came in (in case you missed it)
 
as have i

personally i believe quotes when they are direct from the horses mouth, of which there are many from Redknapp who wasn't exactly shy about broadcasting his/our interest in players - which is what the discussion at hand was about when you came in (in case you missed it)

Do you believe the quotes from Bale in Marca?

When Redknapp rolls his window down for SSN, then it's pretty hard to dispute, but when it's in a newspaper/online article, Jumpers has a point.
 
as have i

personally i believe quotes when they are direct from the horses mouth, of which there are many from Redknapp who wasn't exactly shy about broadcasting his/our interest in players - which is what the discussion at hand was about when you came in (in case you missed it)

A lot of printed quotes are taken out of context. Redknapp just talks and talks and so makes it easy for the media to take sound bites. When you listen to the entire interview it often is completely different.
 
Do you believe the quotes from Bale in Marca?

When Redknapp rolls his window down for SSN, then it's pretty hard to dispute, but when it's in a newspaper/online article, Jumpers has a point.

which quotes are they? when a publication has been proven to falsify quotes (Modric and Bale from earlier in the window) then i will of course be skeptical.

when i see with my own eyes someone say something i tend to believe it - i guess there's always the chance he may have had Willie Mckay holding a gun at him off screen telling him to read from an auto cue.


anyway this is all getting a bit tin foil hat phalanx for my liking - you know as well as i know there are quotes from Redknapp on the 'brick players' you are referring to, so far the only quotes from AVB on Hooper are that we weren't in anyway interested - there isn't really any more mileage in this conversation that i can see mate and it's a bit late to start discussing the dubious nature of how quotes are presented in the press
 
Do you believe the quotes from Bale in Marca?

When Redknapp rolls his window down for SSN, then it's pretty hard to dispute, but when it's in a newspaper/online article, Jumpers has a point.

You're not reading it right.

When a person is attributed to have said something directly to the journo and the papers put it in quotes, you can pretty much believe it. There are examples of when it's not true but they usually end up in a retraction.

What Marca do is quote "a friend", "an anonymous source", "a Spurs insider", etc. That is not a quote, that's made up.
 
which quotes are they? when a publication has been proven to falsify quotes (Modric and Bale from earlier in the window) then i will of course be skeptical.

when i see with my own eyes someone say something i tend to believe it - i guess there's always the chance he may have had Willie Mckay holding a gun at him off screen telling him to read from an auto cue.


anyway this is all getting a bit tin foil hat phalanx for my liking - you know as well as i know there are quotes from Redknapp on the 'brick players' you are referring to, so far the only quotes from AVB on Hooper are that we aren't in anyway interested - there isn't really any more mileage in this conversation that i can see mate and it's a bit late to start discussing the dubious nature of how quotes are presented in the press

The proof is in the pudding when it comes to transfers anyway. What managers say and do are usually two different things. They should be judged on who is brought in. Redknapp did well for us in the transfer market I feel. AVB seems to have done well this window and last Summer he brought in Lloris and Vertonghen. If a manager buys 5 players and 2 of them come good, then for me that's acceptable.
 
The proof is in the pudding when it comes to transfers anyway. What managers say and do are usually two different things. They should be judged on who is brought in. Redknapp did well for us in the transfer market I feel. AVB seems to have done well this window and last Summer he brought in Lloris and Vertonghen. If a manager buys 5 players and 2 of them come good, then for me that's acceptable.


you're not wrong there at all - im not really sure how this discussion cropped up but i was merely pointing out to Jurgen that comparing AvB's (unproven) interest in Hooper with Redknapps much more provable interest in XY and Z didn't really make much sense.

Redknapp bought well in the market, however Im personally skeptical as to how he would have fared had Levy not been keeping him on a tight leash. but that's a debate for another day
 
“You made me a promise. You promised me if we didn’t qualify for the Champions League and a good offer turned up you’d listen to it,” Marca quotes Bale as saying to chairman Levy.

- See more at: http://www.premiershiptalk.com/2013...-surprising-bale-quotes/#sthash.iyQGWQ25.dpuf


are you on a wind up here? :lol:

edit : ah forget it it's too late, i can't be bothered ... but c'mon man you're not seriously putting that forward as an example are you?
 
“You made me a promise. You promised me if we didn’t qualify for the Champions League and a good offer turned up you’d listen to it,” Marca quotes Bale as saying to chairman Levy.

- See more at: http://www.premiershiptalk.com/2013...-surprising-bale-quotes/#sthash.iyQGWQ25.dpuf

To start with you've quoted a second hand source - at least read the original Marca article and link it.

Now there's a couple of issues with the content of the original story. Firstly, Marca never claims to have been present at the discussion, nor does it claim that Bale said those words directly to one of its reporters. That is quoting a source. Should you, Bale or Spurs choose to take Marca to court over the content of that article, they will be able to claim that "an unnamed source" either was present or related the info second hand. AFAIK, they can't be forced to reveal that source except in extreme circumstances.

Secondly, it's Marca. In the same way that NASA doesn't bother disputing what's written in the National Enquirer and I don't bother refuting all of Gifter's mental claims in Random, Spurs are unlikely to chase after reporters from such an irrelevant, low rent rag.
 
Secondly, it's Marca. In the same way that NASA doesn't bother disputing what's written in the National Enquirer and I don't bother refuting all of Gifter's mental claims in Random, Spurs are unlikely to chase after reporters from such an irrelevant, low rent rag.

:ross:
 
To start with you've quoted a second hand source - at least read the original Marca article and link it.

Now there's a couple of issues with the content of the original story. Firstly, Marca never claims to have been present at the discussion, nor does it claim that Bale said those words directly to one of its reporters. That is quoting a source. Should you, Bale or Spurs choose to take Marca to court over the content of that article, they will be able to claim that "an unnamed source" either was present or related the info second hand. AFAIK, they can't be forced to reveal that source except in extreme circumstances.

Secondly, it's Marca. In the same way that NASA doesn't bother disputing what's written in the National Enquirer and I don't bother refuting all of Gifter's mental claims in Random, Spurs are unlikely to chase after reporters from such an irrelevant, low rent rag.

I bet if Marca had a quote about Redknapp you'd believe it :lol:
 
The proof is in the pudding when it comes to transfers anyway. What managers say and do are usually two different things. They should be judged on who is brought in. Redknapp did well for us in the transfer market I feel. AVB seems to have done well this window and last Summer he brought in Lloris and Vertonghen. If a manager buys 5 players and 2 of them come good, then for me that's acceptable.

Redknapp did well at finding short term solutions to the problems in our squad. He deserves a lot of credit for that.

Overall during his time at the club I thought there were too many short term solutions and not enough long term focus with his transfers though. Whoever was in charge of bringing in Walker and Sandro deserve credit, Redknapp himself gave the credit for Sandro to the head scout, but I think he was one of the people Redknapp's brought in so he should get credit indirectly at least I suppose. But overall there were too many players "on the wrong side of 25" I think.

We've seemingly change in strategy to what we had before Redknapp where most of our first team signings are around 25 and younger. Not without exception of course, as it should be.
 
Personality wise, I love Jol and Redknapp although tactically they weren't always the best. My vote goes to Redknapp though just because we were so exciting to watch whilst he was in charge and he was the one guy who managed to get us in to the Champions League, where we shone so brightly for a while.
 
A lot of printed quotes are taken out of context. Redknapp just talks and talks and so makes it easy for the media to take sound bites. When you listen to the entire interview it often is completely different.

Which, in the end, has always contributed to his situations. Totally 'open' question here in the spirit of discussion. Why is it, you think, that Redknapp has never stuck around anywhere longer than 3-4 seasons bar West Ham? I personally think he often knows when the moment has come to get out. Interested in your thoughts.
 
Which, in the end, has always contributed to his situations. Totally 'open' question here in the spirit of discussion. Why is it, you think, that Redknapp has never stuck around anywhere longer than 3-4 seasons bar West Ham? I personally think he often knows when the moment has come to get out. Interested in your thoughts.

Sorry for stepping in on your dance but can I offer an answer. I was talking to a Blackpool supporting mate earlier in the week about Holloway. He thought that Olly left them at the right time because his motivational techniques were beginning to get diminishing returns.

I think that there are so many times that you can motivate someone to lift their performance. I think that this is true of Redknapp which would also explain why he has such a high turnover of players.
 
Sorry for stepping in on your dance but can I offer an answer. I was talking to a Blackpool supporting mate earlier in the week about Holloway. He thought that Olly left them at the right time because his motivational techniques were beginning to get diminishing returns.

I think that there are so many times that you can motivate someone to lift their performance. I think that this is true of Redknapp which would also explain why he has such a high turnover of players.

but we have a high turn over of players under AVB too?
 
Back