• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Another shooting in Murica


Not a thought for the kid but yet we are asked to give our thoughts to the billy big bollox scumbags who wont do the decent thing and comply with the police..

Whilst I'm raging, Dawn Butler can do one too..

A terrible thing. Disgraceful.

But you're a man of blanket thinking. Fruit is fruit. Cheese is cheese. That sort of thing.

"Billy big bollox scumbags who won't do the decent thing and comply with police..."

Elijah McClain was hardly a "Billy big bollox scumbag" now was he. It is not, FYI, a question.

Watch all of it, starting with the "fear of a black planet" coward of a caller.

 
The media , the BBC and their useful idiots are now using the word protest instead of the word riot..

They're not protesting, they're rioting.. They riot after every police shooting of a black man who doesn't do the sensible thing and comply with the request of police officers.

They rioted last week when police shot and injured another black guy in Chicago...

They're burning and looting, smashing up people's livelihoods whilst BLM & Democrats say nothing .. In fact the only noises coming from BLM spokespeople is that the carnage is a form of reparation!

Right now, BLM is nothing but an extortionist mafiosi operation..

Hardly you old drama Queen.
I have not seen many hundreds of riots per year.
 
You made it about black and white Scara. Wriggle all you want, you went there. Fact.

Of course most people know it is not about colour (the shooting? THAT is, subsequent looting? flimflam)...you should get on board.
Care to point out where I made it about race?

This is about the underclass wanting to take what they haven't earned, nothing more or less.
 
Last edited:
Care to point out where I made it about race?

This is about the underclass wanting to take what they haven't earned, nothing more or less.

You mentioned colour. How much clearer is it than that?
If you want to descend into your usual classist gonad*s then make it about that and don't bring colour into it.
If your point had been about the "underclass" then there are many ways to phrase it without bringing colour into your statement.
If you'd like some advice, here's a way.
You could've said, "more civil unrest in the US, I suppose we will now see the looters out again."
Any further tips on how to make your "primary" point without raising other incidental issues, let me know.
 
Last edited:
It's what happened the last couple of times a black man getting shot made the news.

Can you honestly tell me you don't think this will end in looting?

Edit: It appears to be too late for anyone to still think that
https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2020/0...st-in-kenosha-after-police-shoot-jacob-blake/

Right.
Because once again, you weren't inferring that looting only happens when black people are shot.
You probably have no idea about the looting that is going on in California during the fires. No black people getting shot (thankfully) but still we have looters.
 
You mentioned colour. How much clearer is it than that?
If you want to descend into your usual classist gonad*s then make it about that and don't bring colour into it.
If your point had been about the "underclass" then there are many ways to phrase it without bringing colour into your statement.
If you'd like some advice, here's a way.
You could've said, "more civil unrest in the US, I suppose we will now see the looters out again."
Any further tips on how to make your "primary" point without raising other incidental issues, let me know.
Colour wasn't in relation to who was rioting, it was in relation to who was shot. I don't believe anyone's rioting over white people being shot. If they are, please let me know and I'll change my statement.

I'll repeat in case it wasn't clear the first time - I'm not saying that those looting are black, I genuinely couldn't care less what their skin colour is. What I do know is that they are a scummy underclass who will use any excuse to steal things and set fire to buildings.
 
Right.
Because once again, you weren't inferring that looting only happens when black people are shot.
You probably have no idea about the looting that is going on in California during the fires. No black people getting shot (thankfully) but still we have looters.
I am absolutely inferring that looting only happens when black people get shot. I'm not saying that those doing the looting are of any particular race, neither do I believe they are.
 
Colour wasn't in relation to who was rioting, it was in relation to who was shot. I don't believe anyone's rioting over white people being shot. If they are, please let me know and I'll change my statement.

I'll repeat in case it wasn't clear the first time - I'm not saying that those looting are black, I genuinely couldn't care less what their skin colour is. What I do know is that they are a scummy underclass who will use any excuse to steal things and set fire to buildings.

Taking you at your word I'd suggest a rephrase to underscore your point and not look like you're sniding off another.
 
I am absolutely inferring that looting only happens when black people get shot. I'm not saying that those doing the looting are of any particular race, neither do I believe they are.

If that is what you are inferring then consider yourself wrong and proven so. I really don't wish to have to go through lists of examples (needless to say I gave you one and there are many many more). In fact, if you genuinely believe that looting only occurs "when black people are shot" it tells me your life experiences and knowledge are dangerously myopic.
 
Taking you at your word I'd suggest a rephrase to underscore your point and not look like you're sniding off another.
Apologies if it wasn't clear - I thought that both the wording and my continual assertions on this site that people shouldn't be judged by how they are born were enough to avoid that reading.
 
Back