I am completely fine with someone having the opinion of Ange not being good enough for our club. I might disagree, but I’m fine with it.
What really irks me though is comments like ‘the George Weah’s cousin of managers’. Yes it’s a joke, but the implication is that he is so bad that not only is he not our level, but that he is actually out of place at the professional level.
And maybe you could say that about someone like Terry Connor at Wolves for example. Someone who was so completely of of their depth, that they acknowledged it themselves, and were never a manager afterwards. But a guy that has won trophies at every single club he has been at, including ours, the most trophy repellent big club of the last 15 years?
It’s just so disrespectful and it boggles the mind. There’s probably a fair debate to be had around whether his particular style would ultimately work when the level of quality in the PL is so high…but again, he won a trophy with us and got us 5th in his first season. I think he’s earned his right to be here. It’s one thing to think his style might be a bit naive to use at all times, but it also feels like with Ange there’s some weird football classism because he is Australian, where it’s fine to ridicule who he is and what he does in a way a way that just doesn’t sit right. Russell Martin gets very similar treatment, but Ange has been way more successful at a higher level than Russell Martin.
So my point is, he deserves to be at this level. He’s been tasked with turning a reactive team into a proactive team without a pre season and with the games coming thick and fast. And in most of his games with Forest he’s been unlucky not to win, with strong underlying numbers. It’s not really a point that you can get through in this algorithmic world where banter and ‘takes’ drive the media and punditry, but there’s an ocean of space between making that point, and ridiculing him for being way out of his depth, which he just isn’t.