Baleforce
Martin Peters
it's Corbyn snark
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Politics, politics, politics
- Thread starter markysimmo
- Start date
it's Corbyn snark
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
What has he got to be snarky about?
Baleforce
Martin Peters
the joke being that Jezza seemingly has much more to say about Bolivia than he does Brexit
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
Ah! And now I feel a bit dense....
StephenH
David Ginola
Its a brand of Yoghurt I think?
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
He's smarter than that. It's just he's about the most fervent Brexiteer in parliament, but trying to lead a party that's split 50:50 over it. So, as he's in opposition and doesn't actually need to do anything, avoidance is absolutely the smartest thing to do
nayimfromthehalfwayline
Andy Thompson
Yeah that's the one [emoji28]
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
"Kwasi Kwarteng, a Conservative, asks about a 100-year-old bellringer in his constituency, believed to be the oldest in the world. May says this is a considerable record and wishes the constituent happy birthday."
StephenH
David Ginola
Nothing to do with Brexit. That's a total farce.
He's a clown as an opposition leader. An abject waste of space in the big picture.
He is the wedge under the door that keeps it permanently open for the Tories to continue muddling along.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
His domestic agenda would win a landslide for them. It's only the distrust that they would deliver Brexit even less well that keeps the Tories in.
StephenH
David Ginola
I love a change to Labour but not lead by Mr Corbyn.
We are between a rock and a Mr Bean.
ShipOfTheseus
Clint Dempsey
Meaningless unless 160 Tory MPs are prepared to vote her out.
ShipOfTheseus
Clint Dempsey
Agree that a VONC in May would be good for her. It might happen by accident, because letters aren't coordinated any more: various sides are submitting them.
There isn't really an issue about getting the agreement through Cabinet - which has no formal veto - merely one of how many Cabinet ministers resign. Of course, the number that she loses is relevant to the first question, which is whether she can get the agreement through Parliament.
It looks very much as if she can't.
Then, the question is whether the government can survive, which comes down to how aggressively the DUP react. It's possible that they will withdraw supply but not confidence: keep the Tories in power, but not agree a budget until an orange-flavoured Brexit is delivered.
In those circumstances, we could have a government of national unity, a second referendum or another election. The last is what May has form for. But whichever of them happened, Article 50 would either need to be revoked or extended.
There isn't really an issue about getting the agreement through Cabinet - which has no formal veto - merely one of how many Cabinet ministers resign. Of course, the number that she loses is relevant to the first question, which is whether she can get the agreement through Parliament.
It looks very much as if she can't.
Then, the question is whether the government can survive, which comes down to how aggressively the DUP react. It's possible that they will withdraw supply but not confidence: keep the Tories in power, but not agree a budget until an orange-flavoured Brexit is delivered.
In those circumstances, we could have a government of national unity, a second referendum or another election. The last is what May has form for. But whichever of them happened, Article 50 would either need to be revoked or extended.