The 'If You Still Need to Purge Yourself Of Ange' Thread

[Mikey10]

Football Daily | ‘He’s behind you!’ Is Postecoglou the real villain in Forest’s panto?

In today’s Football Daily: unpopular Australian villains in Nottinghamshire

www.theguardian.com

 

[Jordinho]

The article on the BBC means he's in big trouble. It says he has support but there is "a sense the match at St James' Park is likely to be significant in how Forest view Postecoglou's position moving forward".

That's pretty mind boggling. Ange is doing exactly what it says on the tin and 6 games is not any amount of time to judge a manager. If they fire him this quickly, it means their chairman has made arguably the most batbrick crazy appointment in the history of the league and now realised it despite it being an obviously terrible fit after Nuno. To me, that means the chairman is not competent to run a football club.

I feel a bit of sympathy for Ange to be honest.

Olympiakos go through at least a couple of managers most seasons. He even sacked one after just two matches because they got knocked out of the CL qualifying. Sacking people on a whim is how he works.

 

[Rafa87]

The article on the BBC means he's in big trouble. It says he has support but there is "a sense the match at St James' Park is likely to be significant in how Forest view Postecoglou's position moving forward".

That's pretty mind boggling. Ange is doing exactly what it says on the tin and 6 games is not any amount of time to judge a manager. If they fire him this quickly, it means their chairman has made arguably the most batbrick crazy appointment in the history of the league and now realised it despite it being an obviously terrible fit after Nuno. To me, that means the chairman is not competent to run a football club.

I feel a bit of sympathy for Ange to be honest.

I have to say, regardless of my own views of Ange or his ability, for me if you sack him after what…7 games? It’s the club who look like clowns not him. All it does is highlight what a terrible bit of management from the chairman it is, and that his recruitment is as shoddy as his decision making.

I think Forest really thought they were becoming big boys this summer, and they’ve really got it all wrong.

 

[glorygloryeze]

The article on the BBC means he's in big trouble. It says he has support but there is "a sense the match at St James' Park is likely to be significant in how Forest view Postecoglou's position moving forward".

That's pretty mind boggling. Ange is doing exactly what it says on the tin and 6 games is not any amount of time to judge a manager. If they fire him this quickly, it means their chairman has made arguably the most batbrick crazy appointment in the history of the league and now realised it despite it being an obviously terrible fit after Nuno. To me, that means the chairman is not competent to run a football club.

I feel a bit of sympathy for Ange to be honest.

Let's be honest, no-one forced Ange to take the job....he was either really confident in his abilities to show that we had made a mistake in getting rid of him, or he is simply deluded

 

[Baleforce]

I have to say, regardless of my own views of Ange or his ability, for me if you sack him after what…7 games? It’s the club who look like clowns not him. All it does is highlight what a terrible bit of management from the chairman it is, and that his recruitment is as shoddy as his decision making.

I think Forest really thought they were becoming big boys this summer, and they’ve really got it all wrong.

They looked like clowns the moment they appointed him.

But by that same token, as soon as you realise you have hired the wrong person, the sooner you get rid the better.

 

[Rafa87]

They looked like clowns the moment they appointed him.

But by that same token, as soon as you realise you have hired the wrong person, the sooner you get rid the better.

Yeah that’s fair, I can see that really you rectify the mistake before you’re in the championship. What a brick show though.

 

[DeanoAustin]

Let's be honest, no-one forced Ange to take the job....he was either really confident in his abilities to show that we had made a mistake in getting rid of him, or he is simply deluded

Yeah he took the job but sacking a manager after 7 games? That's bonkers stuff in my opinion. You have to give the man a chance.

 

[Robspur12]

They didn’t though.
How quickly we move on!
Trophies Shmophies.

Not at all. No one has said they are not grateful for the trophy. But I didn't really rate Ange here and I'm not surprised how it's turned out at Forest. I still think they need to give him more time. Tbh the PL is more interesting with him in it.

 

[thfcsteff]

The article on the BBC means he's in big trouble. It says he has support but there is "a sense the match at St James' Park is likely to be significant in how Forest view Postecoglou's position moving forward".

That's pretty mind boggling. Ange is doing exactly what it says on the tin and 6 games is not any amount of time to judge a manager. If they fire him this quickly, it means their chairman has made arguably the most batbrick crazy appointment in the history of the league and now realised it despite it being an obviously terrible fit after Nuno. To me, that means the chairman is not competent to run a football club.

I feel a bit of sympathy for Ange to be honest.

It would be pathetic. Like that owner.

 

[thfcsteff]

Let's be honest, no-one forced Ange to take the job....he was either really confident in his abilities to show that we had made a mistake in getting rid of him, or he is simply deluded

or he weighed it up and realised that even with that bloke in charge, he'd at the very least end up getting paid approx 300k a week (which will likely be what it ends up being if he gets sacked and paid off)???