He wasn't OK though, not by the standards of a team with our ambitions.You know as well as I do that Wanyama, Palacios and Freund are holding, defensive midfielders and can get by on hard work being the limit of their expectations. Jenas, Paulinho and Sissoko are all similar players with more forward running expectation and all have suffered from a section of our fan base picking at them in some weird quasi bully-acting campaign where nothing they can do will satisfy them. They don't fit a preconceived notion of what someone in their position should be doing, because those fans make their mind up on these players quickly, and that is that. It's probably occurred to none of these people that Sissoko is used to playing deeper on the pitch with space to run into, and even though he was one of the attacking 3 midfielders when playing for Saudi Sportswashing Machine, he would have started deeper on the pitch to counter attack. With us, he's always played further forward which has meant a new role effectively. Does any of these anti Sissoko types think about that? Is their any patience afforded to him by them? Is their heck. 'Haha, he's like a 9 year old because he went offside!'
And you must surely see it's a point of discussion because some people still have to be overly negative on him when it isn't warranted. I haven't seen anyone say Sissoko was an 8/10 or higher, merely that he's played well like the whole team did. And while a lot of players get credit for playing their part in a great performance, Sissoko is caveated until cows come home. That's why this is a point of conversation. The people favouring him are saying it how it is, and the people determined to prove their opinion on him correct are the ones least in touch with reality and determined to talk him down unjustly.
As for Lamela or Townsend, if they play well, they get the praise without weird caveats thrown in, and they get criticised when they deserve. There has been nothing like the level of sustained negativity towards those players in spite of decent performances.
At the risk if sounding like a stuck record, he was at the bottom (or one from) in touches, passes, pass completion, loss of possession, etc. He was at least as bad (arguably worse) than a player who had as big a stinker as I can remember him having for us (Alli).
Lloris didn't have to do much but stunk it up when he did. Alli was involved a lot and made a lot of mistakes. But both of those players have been more than good enough to justify starting in the past. This is Sissoko's best so far and it's still waaaaaay below the standard we need.
I'd be more understanding about his inclusion if he'd done anything in his previous career to have earned it. But other than one match against us and one for France, he hasn't done that either.