We wanted him
But his agents added on a huge signing on fee
Eriksen himself said we didn't make any contact.
We wanted him
But his agents added on a huge signing on fee
3 months ago, Eriksen's shadow was twice as creative as any midfielder we had. But now that we have Maddison, it's obviously the better outcome.Not going for Eriksen was not a bad thing, he looks a shadow of the player he once was.
True and we will never know why.We could have had eriksen. Conte knew him. Sure levy would have wanted him back on a free. But we didn't even go for him.
This is funny ....
Meanwhile, over at arsemania, they're still claiming Havertz is vastly superior to Maddison.
For comparison, Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists in his last 20 games....
Not going for Eriksen was not a bad thing, he looks a shadow of the player he once was.
What does Mount do better than Maddison?
I'm baffled that they did not appear to even register interest in Madders
Who do you think will be most like for like back up to maddison?
Skipp is more of a sarr, as seen from pre season.
Hojberg cannot do quick passes and quick darts as well as Madd but he does have an eye for goal (sometimes)
Bentancur ? Or even Solomon?
Top, top quality trolling that!
Lo Celso, don’t think he’ll leave.
He's a lovely bloke and great banter that with the crowd. I love him in our shirt and he's just the personality you want from one of your better players.
Lo Celso, don’t think he’ll leave.
He won’tLo Celso, don’t think he’ll leave.
He won’t
No one can afford him
And Ange likes him