See, I don't mind compromise. If
both sides agree to call her a ****, that's fine by me too.
In all seriousness, come on Steff. We don't need this stigmatization of the opposing side, not at this stage of the season. A whole lot of people use GG as a sort of group therapy anyway, and the last thing you need at Alcoholics Anonymous for example, is someone calling everyone new 'boozy ****s' and saying they don't deserve to be a teetotaler because they're depressed about their chances of quitting.
Constructive action is (rather sadly) the preserve of the optimists. You have a responsibility to try to life people out of their morass of doubt and negativity, and that isn't done by indirectly criticising those who don't believe as strongly as you do.
Psychology is tough, I know. But it's the way we are. Forging unity is always much harder than it looks on paper. It's why it was so difficult for Attlee, Bevan and the working class to build the welfare state: it took two world wars and a global economic crash in between before the aristocratic right-wing tendencies in British politics were swept away, taking the most successful war-time prime minister this country's ever had with them. But it's ludicrously easy to divide people again, as Thatcher proved by appealing to enough people's self-interests to make the fates of those who felt the brunt of her policies completely irrelevant.
Start by reconciling. Please. We don't need this brick now.