Apart from leicester and villa who have we lost to in the league?
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
ENIC
- Thread starter mattls
- Start date
Apart from leicester and villa who have we lost to in the league?
Remember seeing the financials when we qualified with redknapp. The wages (for the club) jumped by 30%.
Dunno what it is now. But it might effect some players. Caring less for cup games. Even if it's only a few percentages.
I dunno. Just speculating.
Glenda's Legs
Les Ferdinand
I can't really believe that to be the case (saving themselves), at least not consciously so. But there must be something in the way the players are prepped for games like this that backfires on us. A kind of arrogance that it's a lower league team so we don't have to put in as much effort? Although you'd think we'd have learnt from that by now.
Edit : thinking about it some more, I suppose there will be players not happy that they only get to play in what might be perceived as the "lesser value" games, so that might impact on commitment levels (even though as fans we'd think they should be seeing it as a chance to prove a point).
Last edited:
Baleforce
Martin Peters
Isn’t two glaring disasters enough
Spur of the moment
Frederic Kanoute
Seems to me the message is crystal clear. Make wholesale changes to the team for cup games and you are asking for trouble. It's happened too often to be coincidence.
That team yesterday was sent out with a noose over it's head.
That team yesterday was sent out with a noose over it's head.
DeanoAustin
Christian Ziege
Not sure if this is the right place for it. Just found this on YouTube. I remember us being in serious financial trouble and Sugar’s fight with the FA but I never knew the details of what went on. fudge me, how we avoided automatic relegation is a mystery especially after what happened to Swindon around that time. We were in it up to our necks.
I also remember the vitriol directed at Sugar when he fired Venables. While, like most fans, I was on Venables’ side, it was poisonous. I think history has shown that Sugar was right.
Say what you like about Levy and Sugar but we really were run by absolute crooks for a time.
I also remember the vitriol directed at Sugar when he fired Venables. While, like most fans, I was on Venables’ side, it was poisonous. I think history has shown that Sugar was right.
Say what you like about Levy and Sugar but we really were run by absolute crooks for a time.
Bedfordspurs
Arthur Rowe
Sugar was right because he only thought about the business. It was probably needed at the time too
Grays_1890
Colin Calderwood
I was always pro Venebles at the time but you learn more and now I'm always thankful for his footballing time but Sugar was huge in saving the club and he was right about Saint Venebles.
Crazy times that the manager had full control of contracts
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
Crazy times that the manager had full control of contracts
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
Lemonade Money
Steffen Freund
So was there an Ardiles sized connection between the financial troubles of Spurs and Swindon?
Grays_1890
Colin Calderwood
Not sure TBH, probably worth a gander, Hoddle was there for a while too ey but imagine that was after that time, not sure on the timelines of Swindons woes
Sent from my SM-A127F using Fapatalk
parklane1
Vic Buckingham
Yep he did, if it had not been for Sugar we would have ended up in the hands of the crook Maxwell. IF that had happened the club would have been in REAL trouble.
Levy in bahrain for the grand prix. Guests of liberty media. Also met with msb.
https://www.skysports.com/watch/vid...24539/explained-why-is-daniel-levy-in-bahrain
https://www.skysports.com/watch/vid...24539/explained-why-is-daniel-levy-in-bahrain
90291Spur
Paul Walsh
It’s never gonna happen, but Levy should stay to run the business - at which he is brilliant (if your metric for running a business is making money and raising the profile of a ‘brand’) - and let someone who knows football run the football side. I think @scaramanga is available.
Isn't that the situation now with Paratici looking after the football side?
There seems to be lots of improvements since he joined.
90291Spur
Paul Walsh
But a signing like Spence, which apparently Levy was in charge of, whom conte very publicly said was a ‘club signing’ suggests otherwise.
It doesn't suggest otherwise. Conte has repeatedly said that it was a club signing that he agreed with as one for the future.
Club doesn't just mean Levy, it will be the recruitment team.
Chrissivad
Tim Sherwood
I have no issue with club signings like Spence.
Good, young, home grown player at a good price.
We need to be doing more of these signings to pad out the squad.
Obviously we were missing the starting RWB that was needed before that signing...
We definitely need a DOF who will oversee the running of the club, from the youth squad to the first team, and not just transfers.
Good, young, home grown player at a good price.
We need to be doing more of these signings to pad out the squad.
Obviously we were missing the starting RWB that was needed before that signing...
We definitely need a DOF who will oversee the running of the club, from the youth squad to the first team, and not just transfers.
Yeah but we're struggle atm so that must mean Levy is still too involved in the football side...