Far from it, I think he's one of the most accurate and lucid minds out there. I just wish he'd be a little less verbose at times - makes him very difficult to listen to.Glad you agree Sam Harris is a clam.
Far from it, I think he's one of the most accurate and lucid minds out there. I just wish he'd be a little less verbose at times - makes him very difficult to listen to.Glad you agree Sam Harris is a clam.
They should have captured him alive and got information.![]()
Late to this conversation, but I take it you have plenty of examples of his behaviour top back up this claim?Glad you agree Sam Harris is a clam.
Late to this conversation, but I take it you have plenty of examples of his behaviour top back up this claim?
Are you saying that his data are wrong or are you assuming the data are correct and that it's just wrong to say it?
Are you saying that his data are wrong or are you assuming the data are correct and that it's just wrong to say it?
Who is Sacha Saeen and why should I (or you, or anyone) take that person's evaluation of this at face value?
The conversation between Harris and Murray was published as a podcast episode of a bit over 2 hours. I would urge you to actually listen to it (or at least parts of it) and make your own mind up on what Harris said that was so reprehensible.
If you have actual quotes that shows what Harris said that was problematic (with a bit of context and not just quote mined) that would be a starting point I could accept too.
Some twitter random making a claim and people taking it at face value is part of the problem with the current level of discourse on important topics as far as I'm concerned.
To both of you. I am happy to listen to the whole podcast. Will do. I took the tweet at face value but I guess I should really look in to it.
What are your opinions on what he says?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.