alekaras
The ITK of IDK
Both correct observations. We need to factor in amortized transfer fees and any other transfer related fees (e.g. sign-on bonuses, agent fees). I'm not sure how much that would affect these percentages.
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Financial Results
- Thread starter Jordinho
- Start date
Pity swissramble made his stuff for paying members only as he used to give an estimate for clubs. Chelsea were at around 92% before sacking potter. They won't be effected by uefa rules next season though as they aren't in europe. Not really sure about other clubs.
Spur of the moment
Frederic Kanoute
Okay, but according to Deloitte, the overall ratio of wages to income showed a substantial DECREASE in 2021/22, reducing from 57% to 47%.
Not sure what to make of this tbh.
https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pag.../articles/deloitte-football-money-league.html
Danishfurniturelover
the prettiest spice girl
You have to pay for Swiss Ramble now?
Yep. Changed to a membership model. Even for old reports.
Fans back in stadiums. Concerts etc... boosted revenue. So it would be natural that the % of revenue spent on wages fell. Even if actual wages stayed the same.
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
Is there any alignment or tweaking of the PL rules on the horizon?
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
Simply income (revenue) went up. Post COVID.
Spur of the moment
Frederic Kanoute
So 47% is back to normal then? Still not sure what to make of it.
ricky2tricky4city
Tom Huddlestone
.
Yes. Back to normal (2020).. percentage wise but more spent in monetary terms
What to make of it?. Depends what answers you're looking for?
We spend a certain percentage of our income on wages. The bigger our income the more we have to spend.
Is there some headroom to increase the %. Yes. But that might be affected by the new rules. Plus if we run a different structure/strategy that % might even go down. Academy, young talent from Europe etc.
There are obviously other outlays to be considered as well, transfer fees, agent and manager costs being the obvious.
Yes. They have voted to come more inline. The sticking point is they want to agree with the efl to follow suit. The efl are happy to, but want more money and scrapping of parachute payments.
Again it isn't just wages. Amortisation and agents fees also come into account. Estimates have us still under the 70% though. Probably around 60-65%.
Interesting views of looking at finances, internal cash generated (Spurs 2nd), debt, owner input. Could have been a little more detailed but worth the read
How Premier League clubs make their money – steady Eddies, debt giants and owner-led vehicles - The Athletic (Paywall)
Where is all this cash coming from? Accounting idiosyncrasies and technicalities aside, who’s ultimately paying for these transfers and new stadiums and how are clubs generating cash for all this spending?
How Premier League clubs make their money – steady Eddies, debt giants and owner-led vehicles - The Athletic (Paywall)
Where is all this cash coming from? Accounting idiosyncrasies and technicalities aside, who’s ultimately paying for these transfers and new stadiums and how are clubs generating cash for all this spending?
SpurMeUp
Jimmy Cantrell
Bedfordspurs
Martin Peters
It all goes on the yacht
nattenskonge
Drama queen
I see tv rights ovners are losing money now, Viaplay that have the rights in Skandinavia and poland are losing brick loads.
Here in Norway I have to pay 60£ a month to see PL and another 30£ to see CL.
What do others that pay for the service have to pay? I feel its too expensive now.
Here in Norway I have to pay 60£ a month to see PL and another 30£ to see CL.
What do others that pay for the service have to pay? I feel its too expensive now.
Why are they losing money though? If it is because they are expanding their portfolio it might just be a part of the plan. Netflix did so for years. Sacrificing profit for increased market share.
There's a few groups that the various competitions (Norwegian league, Premier League and CL being the most popular) alternate between. The benefit to the consumer is that it's become ridiculously expensive to follow even one of them, let alone have access to everything you want to watch (if one channel shows the PL, someone else has the domestic cups). You also need change your subscriptions regularly because whoever has the rights changes every two or three years.