• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Harry Kane MBE

billyiddo said:
I'm not so sure about that - if a 100m+ deal is on the line then there's every chance it would be agreed the player is to avoid training
Click to expand...

True, but we'd manage that scenario so it is not news?

Depends how the story is being reported. It appears as though the club are briefing and playing a game with Kane's camp via the media. Which would suggest there isn't a deal in place.
 
Last edited:
If City can only afford 100 mill - then throw in 60 mill worth of players as well. Simple as that - if they want Kane that badly.
 
Daisuk said:
If City can only afford 100 mill - then throw in 60 mill worth of players as well. Simple as that - if they want Kane that badly.
Click to expand...
Such as?
We don’t want the players they will throw in/or would join us
they have plenty of quality we would like but they won’t what you shift them
City are screwed now. Pay the money and they have set a new precedent
Don’t pay it and they start the season without their choice of striker
That wing weaken their team that much but it shows to do business with them
 
Daisuk said:
If City can only afford 100 mill - then throw in 60 mill worth of players as well. Simple as that - if they want Kane that badly.
Click to expand...

Don't think it's realistic - when they allegedly offered £80m plus the "opportunity" to sign a selection of their players it was widely reported those players were not happy being part of that potential deal.
 
I completely get why Kane is doing it but it still stinks. We shouldn’t be paying him as far as I’m concerned. He is paid by the club not just to play matches but also to train.
 
Daisuk said:
If City can only afford 100 mill - then throw in 60 mill worth of players as well. Simple as that - if they want Kane that badly.
Click to expand...
It's not that simple if those players don't want to come too us.

Plus uefa are relaxing ffp regulations due to covid (let's be fair, they were pretty relaxed already). So there really aren't any excuses for Emirates Marketing Project or their owners not to cough up the cash in full.

Its put up or shut up time for those cnuts!
 
Bedfordspurs said:
Such as?
We don’t want the players they will throw in/or would join us
they have plenty of quality we would like but they won’t what you shift them
City are screwed now. Pay the money and they have set a new precedent
Don’t pay it and they start the season without their choice of striker
That wing weaken their team that much but it shows to do business with them
Click to expand...

Completely. I dont see many players who we would want and who would also want to come

Jesus is about the only one I can think of
 
afsoc4life said:
Foden hasn't performed as well as Dele Alli has and I would rather have proven winners over him. What Foden offers at this point is potential.
Click to expand...
It's not just potential, he's already a class player. Proven winner? He's already won a lot and been a key part of the best team in the league.
 
superspurs said:
A strict deadline has to be set now, we simply CAN NOT repeat the Berba/Keane debacle.
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t mind repeating the sell talismanic striker with long ties to the club , new team play him out of position as manager didn’t really want him, player didn’t realise how good he had it and returns 6 month later for a lower fee element of the Keane debacle, as long as Kane doesn’t return half the player too!!!
Jokes aside this is the bit that Levy needs to factor in and Kane needs to understand. The price is the price until the deadline, we cannot afford to be scratching spring in the last week of the window to replace the best striker in the league. If city are serious, and let’s be fair it’s not like a budget is really a concept for them, they either prove how much they want the player by our deadline or wait until next season when with 2 years left our position may change.
 
Last edited:
DubSpur said:
It's not just potential, he's already a class player. Proven winner? He's already won a lot and been a key part of the best team in the league.
Click to expand...

Foden is not a proven winner at senior level. Think back to Dele some years back. You think Foden is as good as Dele back then? I don't see it.

Yes he has won a lot as part of the squad but key member. No.
 
elyid said:
Player swaps are never going to improve the team as efficiently as cash. Think at this point we should just let City know a cash price and say pay it or bugger off.
Click to expand...

We did, the number is £160M, they have also been pretty clear of their valuation, £100M

Kane needs to realize no amount of not turning up for training and bitching is going to make up a £60M gap
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back