I said it when we were fighting relegation last season. If you can't defend you are in trouble in this league with so many tight games. I thought RDZ would realise that but instead went out to buy ball playing defenders instead of ones who could actually defend. We got caught defensively for both goals and got caught one on one several times. Oh and plus we are looking to get rid of our best defensive defender. Early days but there is no way RDZ succeeds here without building a solid defensive base.
Talk about being a drama queen, we made 2 very good chances to score and a fair few half chances so its hardly zero threat in attack.Offering zero threat in attack while leaking goals is not a good place to be in.
We may turn it around but we'll be in another relegation scrap before we know it
Talk about being a drama queen, we made 2 very good chances to score and a fair few half chances so its hardly zero threat in attack.
They were not the regulars.. That was Vic, Porro Van der Ven and Romero. When Danso and Kinsky came in we were more solid and even more so with Spence next to Danso on the right.
You spend the money we spent on players and at the very least you expect their quality and personal responsibility to their performance show through. The level.of copium on "work in progress" only does so much heavily lifting.
Im not writing any player of but im expecting alot more than seeing from those on and off the pitch.
Waiting longer than HS2 as a work in progress, when managers have a billion quids worth of players, regardless of fan bias on who they are, it should be better
The technical side has gone up a lot
But for some of the technical players to excel you need others who aren’t as good
If the manager wants a side that’s technical great but has no physical presence we will get beaten by any organised side that’s technical that can over power us
With the players we have signed id still be starting Danso with VDV at CBYou also don't get away with the idea that just because some players are not yours that you get a pass on with the work in progress. You have to work with the hand you are dealt, if you play the line of "well we can only do what we do with the strongest side available" then you are on the fast track to a bad place. Solanke was a 60m striker, we may of over paid for him but at one point he was a player who got goals in wins, he might not be a long term hope but you have to use him and players like it to get points and wins on the board.
There will be a point come the window closed where with injuries RDZ will be left with players we all think are not up to it, that doesn't mean we all just throw our hands up and give everyone a pass for not being better.
There are worse sides than us doing alot better with what they have, the idea I keep seeing peddled that we spent 400m but because those 400m in total are not all available means we accept this...........thats frankly bollox. We took 10 points from 5 games at the start of the season last year which a much worse side, we need to expect better
Spence was mainly used as a left back and we conceded fewer goals in matches where Danso started than when both VDV and Romero started.Spence started 35 games last season. Danso started 28 games last season.
See I don't really see it as copium of work in progress. I see it as a realistic look at what we have. We seriously almost went down last year and it would have been a true representation of what we were. So yes we've spent oodles this summer but what have we really bought and where does that place us? For it's just to now a reasonable level where I would not expect a relegation struggle, but does that mean I think we are now good food to beat Saudi Sportswashing Machine easily? Id say no.You spend the money we spent on players and at the very least you expect their quality and personal responsibility to their performance show through. The level.of copium on "work in progress" only does so much heavily lifting.
Im not writing any player of but im expecting alot more than seeing from those on and off the pitch.
Waiting longer than HS2 as a work in progress, when managers have a billion quids worth of players, regardless of fan bias on who they are, it should be better
It was square pegs because were playing a specific system but had unsuited or incapable players in the the main roles. That's not a lack of system, that's just a poor implementation of a system.I couldn’t see the system
was it a 4-6-0
A 4-5-1
Couldn’t really tell
Looked like square pegs in round holes I agree because the system wasn’t there
It can!!Can't get much worse tbf
I saw it a bit differently. I thought Tonali did ok and showed some signs of a high quality player. Not having any competent players ahead apart from Marmoush won’t help.Tonali is the only one I can see that directed towards. He had a stinker. Fernandes was our best player. Van Hecke, Robertson, Marmoush were average but don’t think you can place the blame on us losing on them more than anyone else.
See I'm not necessarily expecting us to heat up as such. But I think with good wingers and an actual 10 I would expect the system to look a little bit more cohesive than what we've seen so far.Its rare that sides have bad starts and heat up, usually the other way. I just hope we buck a load of trends and quick
See I don't really see it as copium of work in progress. I see it as a realistic look at what we have. We seriously almost went down last year and it would have been a true representation of what we were. So yes we've spent oodles this summer but what have we really bought and where does that place us? For it's just to now a reasonable level where I would not expect a relegation struggle, but does that mean I think we are now good food to beat Saudi Sportswashing Machine easily? Id say no.
We had chances and opportunities today that maybe if they had fallen to a different player we may have gotten the first goal and the momentum shifts. Despite the loss I don't think we got battered or even outplayed. It was a fairly 50/50 game where Saudi Sportswashing Machine were much more decisive when their chances actually came. Add a bit of that decisiveness to us and the result likely flips.
I don't think you can just say we spent a lot so it should automatically be better than it was today. How much you spend on the players doesn't change their qualities or lack of. Especially when in our context we are over spending now because we had spent so poorly in the last decade. It's not a quick fix, it's going to take some time and every signing isn't going to work.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.