• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Morgan Gibbs-White

So a vindictive owner refusing to sell him to Spurs then. After Forest's one good league finish, and our one poor, he could be the type to believe they're a superior club.

Or it could just be more rumours and speculation, and we'll know in due course.
 
How can you previously agree terms without contacting the player or their representatives already? Are Forest setting up a deal in order to catch another team guilty of tapping up? Perhaps this is Maranakis’ one man mission to clean up football. The hero we didn’t know we needed

I was going to ask the same.

Surely they didn’t have permission either?
 
So a vindictive owner refusing to sell him to Spurs then. After Forest's one good league finish, and our one poor, he could be the type to believe they're a superior club.

Or it could just be more rumours and speculation, and we'll know in due course.

The new Rupert Lowe and SCBC
 
So a vindictive owner refusing to sell him to Spurs then. After Forest's one good league finish, and our one poor, he could be the type to believe they're a superior club.

Or it could just be more rumours and speculation, and we'll know in due course.
There's a lot of Forest fans on twitter thinking they're the big boys now off the back of that finish. Add to that the business with Palace and
as much as I like Nuno, the man, I'm feeling petty and I hope they get relegated.
 
There's a lot of Forest fans on twitter thinking they're the big boys now off the back of that finish. Add to that the business with Palace and
as much as I like Nuno, the man, I'm feeling petty and I hope they get relegated.
No need to take it like that. If we are being honest their owner is acting exactly like we'd want ENIC to do if someone came in for one of our players. It's just business. If we can't get him, we move on. I think he's a good player and we need a player to add depth in that position but context is his output in his best season for Forest is less than half of Maddison's average output for Leicester.
 
I was going to ask the same.

Surely they didn’t have permission either?
The ITK rumour was that City enquired and were told 80m because they didn't know about the release clause, and City didn't go through with it (but perhaps they agreed terms with MGW at that time).
Naughty.
And then we stole in with a 60m bid because we had knowledge of the release clause.
Naughty.
 
No need to take it like that. If we are being honest their owner is acting exactly like we'd want ENIC to do if someone came in for one of our players. It's just business. If we can't get him, we move on. I think he's a good player and we need a player to add depth in that position but context is his output in his best season for Forest is less than half of Maddison's average output for Leicester.

Yes and no. We called out chelsea and utd over modric and berba. We should always hold out for yhe best deal for the club.
But if the club signed a player and had a release clause in the contract. They should honour it.
We have fudged over clubs in the past though. Paying more for kulu and less for bentancur to knock the uraguayan club a bit of sell on. Vorm and siggurdson think was the same.
 
Yes and no. We called out chelsea and utd over modric and berba. We should always hold out for yhe best deal for the club.
But if the club signed a player and had a release clause in the contract. They should honour it.
We have fudged over clubs in the past though. Paying more for kulu and less for bentancur to knock the uraguayan club a bit of sell on. Vorm and siggurdson think was the same.

You're right, we have. It was Davies and Vorm IIRC
 
Back