• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Kyle Walker

The media seems to be working on the basis that this is all about Walker, City and Daniel Levy but the thing we don't really know in all of this is how keen Poch is to sell.

He is in the luxurious position of already having a ready-made quality replacement who also needs more game time so it would be no surprise to discover he covets the £50m or whatever we can get for Walker in order to fund other players of his choice.

It has previously made it clear I believe that whilst the stadium build has already been costed separately there are inevitably limited funds available for large-scale purchases and that therefore we may need to sell before we buy.
 
glasgowspur said:
Looks like he's either angling for a better contract or gaurntees of more playing time, or both.
Click to expand...

Jermaine Jenas said it's about money. That he undersold himself in his last contract talks (which, considering his age, will be his last big deal). Jenas said hearing how much more than him Ryan Bertram earns was the trigger.
 
Gutter Boy said:
Jermaine Jenas said it's about money. That he undersold himself in his last contract talks (which, considering his age, will be his last big deal). Jenas said hearing how much more than him Ryan Bertram earns was the trigger.
Click to expand...
If that is the case then we should pay him more by whatever way is appropriate. He has been a loyal servant to the club and is worth it.
 
Bedfordspurs said:
A bigger club???

A richer club id agree but having money for 5 seasons really doesn't make a side a bigger club mate. They can't even sell out champions league games
Click to expand...
Yes a bigger club ie one that has won trophies in the last twenty years. Walker or any other current player doesnt care that we were good in the 60s compared to a team that are actually winning things during their career....
 
harr1984 said:
Yes a bigger club ie one that has won trophies in the last twenty years. Walker or any other current player doesnt care that we were good in the 60s compared to a team that are actually winning things during their career....
Click to expand...

That makes backburn and leiceter bigger with that logic

Can't say I agree personally

They have won trophies in the last 5 years but that's not a very long Tim
 
Bedfordspurs said:
That makes backburn and leiceter bigger with that logic

Can't say I agree personally

They have won trophies in the last 5 years but that's not a very long Tim
Click to expand...
No it's a combination of things they are superior in everything - the clue is in the calibre of player they attract vs us. The biggest clubs attract the biggest players. You ask who's the bigger club to anyone outside this forum and you won't be getting many saying Spurs....
 
harr1984 said:
No it's a combination of things they are superior in everything - the clue is in the calibre of player they attract vs us. The biggest clubs attract the biggest players. You ask who's the bigger club to anyone outside this forum and you won't be getting many saying Spurs....
Click to expand...

No the richest clubs attract the players because they pay the fees and wages Which in turn builds success

City were in the championship just over 10 years ago.... big clubs don't play 2nd tier football but we have seen clubs from that level have money thrown at them to give them a lift
 
Bedfordspurs said:
No the richest clubs attract the players because they pay the fees and wages Which in turn builds success

City were in the championship just over 10 years ago.... big clubs don't play 2nd tier football but we have seen clubs from that level have money thrown at them to give them a lift
Click to expand...
Yes and City have the money and the success in recent times - we have neither in comparison to them in recent memory which is all any current player is concerned with and are as such a bigger club. Can argue all you want,you'll do well to find many who aren't Spurs fans saying we are a bigger club than City.....
 
harr1984 said:
Yes and City have the money and the success in recent times - we have neither in comparison to them in recent memory which is all any current player is concerned with and are as such a bigger club. Can argue all you want,you'll do well to find many who aren't Spurs fans saying we are a bigger club than City.....
Click to expand...

Just asked two united fans and two Everton fans in the pub.... both sets of fans think we're bigger. One even commented imagine if city built a new ground like yours, how empty it would be

I imagine if your not form England you may have a different opinion and if your quote young too
 
Bedfordspurs said:
Just asked two united fans and two Everton fans in the pub.... both sets of fans think we're bigger. One even commented imagine if city built a new ground like yours, how empty it would be

I imagine if your not form England you may have a different opinion and if your quote young too
Click to expand...
Two Man Utd fans? Ok, I've just asked seven Arsenal fans and they've all said Emirates Marketing Project.....
 
harr1984 said:
No it's a combination of things they are superior in everything - the clue is in the calibre of player they attract vs us. The biggest clubs attract the biggest players. You ask who's the bigger club to anyone outside this forum and you won't be getting many saying Spurs....
Click to expand...
The calibre of players that keep finishing below us in the league.?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back