• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Now perhaps yes. And anyway I was saying moderate in comparison to Man U who dwarf us in that area, perhaps there is a better descriptive word out there. However you want to put it, it has been easier for us to increase our commercial revenue streams than a club already at the very top in that area like Man U....

£297m to £360m. They'll be out of cl for 2 years so will take a big hit. We'll have cl. So we'll be pretty close this season.
You think of the success and the size of club they are compared to us then their commercial department hasn't really done a better job than ours.
 
These podcasts are full of rubbish , 20 minutes in he says ENIC have no money and their accounts are dormant :D

It would appear that the so called expert being interviewed on the podcast is looking at the wrong ENIC . At Companies House there are two ENIC companies one is ENIC Group the other ENIC Ltd, bothregistered at Lilywhite House both have Collecott and Levy as directors. ENIC Group is in fact shown as a dormant company and it is shown that ENIC Ltd have significant control of ENIC Group and the person shown as having significant control of ENIC Ltd is Mr Donovan Gijsbertus Wijmuller Correspondence address 17 Esplanade, St.Helier, Jersey, JE2 3QA, would assume he is a solicitor or lawyer.


The“expert” should have looked into the accounts of ENIC Sports Inc. who own 198,309,971 shares in Tottenham Hotspur Limited and therefore are the parent company but as they are registered in The Bahamas unless you have the authority it's not so easy to look at their accounts , that's where cash injections to TH Limited have come from.
 
Last edited:
Not sure why we need these ex Manure people , Levy and others have done fine , according to Deloitte figures from 2006 (earliest I can find), commercial income for Manure was 73 million euros and Spurs 40 million, in the latest money league Manure 360 million , Spurs 297 million. Manure percentage increase 393% , Spurs 642%
 
I see City have just re-negotiated with Puma a new ten year £100m a year deal. We are stuck at £30m till 2033 as we signed a long term deal before refinancing the stadium debt to help us get good rates. Based on that I’d imagine our market value for a deal would be around £60-70m.
 
I see City have just re-negotiated with Puma a new ten year £100m a year deal. We are stuck at £30m till 2033 as we signed a long term deal before refinancing the stadium debt to help us get good rates. Based on that I’d imagine our market value for a deal would be around £60-70m.
Levy was asked about our shirt deal by THST back in 2019, apparently we kept our merchandise rights that some other clubs sell , all very confusing.

 
I see City have just re-negotiated with Puma a new ten year £100m a year deal. We are stuck at £30m till 2033 as we signed a long term deal before refinancing the stadium debt to help us get good rates. Based on that I’d imagine our market value for a deal would be around £60-70m.

Not as straight forward as that. As there are different percentages of each shirt sale. £100m might be no percentage. While £30m might mean we get 30% of each shirt sold. Which could add up.
Won't be £70m. But then using city's deals as a yard stick is stupid as we know they're gonads.
 
Not as straight forward as that. As there are different percentages of each shirt sale. £100m might be no percentage. While £30m might mean we get 30% of each shirt sold. Which could add up.
Won't be £70m. But then using city's deals as a yard stick is stupid as we know they're gonads.
Yep
That’s nailed it
It’s not straight forward at all
 
Back