• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Craig_J said:
Right now when owners are allowed to cover (I might be wrong, only did a quick google) £90m of loss for a 3yr period at every club it feels like every club needs their own sugar daddy just to reset things back to how they were - and so many have them already it can't be far away...

All clubs can have a owner throwing in the max invesmtent allowed, then everyone will be on fair compeition again....
Click to expand...

Yes it will get everyone back to where they were. Apart from the fact that if any of those owners stop investing the clubs couldn't survive without having a fire sale. Which would most likely lead to them getting relegated. Which would mean they'd lose revenue and have to have a fire sale etc...

It's why psr/ffp was brought in to stop it. They niw need to fully uphold the rules and get rid of the loopholes.
 
Craig_J said:
Right now when owners are allowed to cover (I might be wrong, only did a quick google) £90m of loss for a 3yr period at every club it feels like every club needs their own sugar daddy just to reset things back to how they were - and so many have them already it can't be far away...

All clubs can have a owner throwing in the max invesmtent allowed, then everyone will be on fair compeition again....
Click to expand...

If we just try to buy success what is the point?

Any idiot can do that.

If we start spending more than we make I’m out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back