• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Poll: last 4 games: Defoe or Adebayor? Or both?

For the last 4 games who should start in our attack?

  • Defoe (1 up)

    Votes: 27 51.9%
  • Adebayor (1 up)

    Votes: 18 34.6%
  • Both Defoe and Adebayor

    Votes: 7 13.5%

  • Total voters
    52
  • Poll closed .
And what exactly does he do with those touches? Is he bringing others into play? Setting up goals or even being involved in the buildup? Personally I don't see a massive difference in a player not touching the ball much versus a player touching the ball more and the ball ricocheting into touch.

He does more with them than Defoe and that's all I care about.
 
Since New Years Ade has scored 4 and Defoe 1. Ade on average touches the ball at least twice as often as Defoe and his movement is better.

His movement is tinkle-poor - are you having a laugh?

Those little statistics from some fan-boy twitter blog mean nothing if his 'touches' fail to contribute to anything meaningful. Imagine how many times Parker touches the ball with his 1-2s back to Dawson.

I know you hate Defoe but this is something else - Ade has been fudge poor
 
I don't really want Dempsey in the side.

We need his goals though.


Funny how they didn't nullify him in the first half of the season when Defoe was playing well.

I don't think Bale's play has anything to do with either of them.

Didn't he score a great goal against Emirates Marketing Project when Defoe was on the pitch too?

I could cite games where Ade has played and Bale also played badly.

Bale's whole emergence over the winter (remember he didn't start the season especially well) co-incided with Defoe getting injured and Ade coming in.

Ade just keeps possession in our opponents half (in contrast to Defoe who gives it away 9 times out of 10) and feeds it back into that area that Bale occupies. He also pulls wide to create that space for Bale to come into the middle.
 
It just goes to show how pathetic some the Defoe agenda has become - completely void of any factual reference to reality - pushing the same old 'outlet' story which hasn't happened all season

Why is it impossible to debate without referencing some sort of agenda? People genuinely don't rate Defoe and list reasons why. It's not an agenda, it's their opinion. Conversely the same for Ade.

I actually am starting to miss Keane v Defoe now
 
His movement is tinkle-poor - are you having a laugh?

Those little statistics from some fan-boy twitter blog mean nothing if his 'touches' fail to contribute to anything meaningful. Imagine how many times Parker touches the ball with his 1-2s back to Dawson.

I know you hate Defoe but this is something else - Ade has been fudge poor

And for the last 4 months Defoe has been poorer. That's my point. It's a choice between the two, not whether any of them are world class.
 
The fact that Defoe has scored 1 goal in 2013? Or that half of his involvements in a game ends with him shooting wide?

And what do Ade's 'involvements' end up with - bouncing off his knee into touch or being dispossessed for the 87th time? Defoe carries far more goal threat at moment, as far as I'm concerned.
 
Tbf, when Defoe was in great form in the first half of the season it rarely co-incided with when Bale or Dempsey were in form. Their best forms seem not to be linked at all.

I actually agree, but Bale's form is not linked to Ade either. But there were games when both Defoe and Bale either scored in or played well in, but that doesn't mean the two are connected. I simply feel Defoe is more likely to get us a goal. We've got a team that doesn't get enough goals.
 
And what do Ade's 'involvements' end up with - bouncing off his knee into touch or being dispossessed for the 87th time? Defoe carries far more goal threat at moment, as far as I'm concerned.

What goal threat is that? Not being involved, shooting from hopeless positions, not being able to pass to better positioned team mates? He scored one goal on a counter attack against City, he's not good enough to start as a lone striker. Ade is marginally less useless.
 
Just to add this to the debate; Defoe played with Bale and Dempsey/Lennon against a team that will probably be the one with the worst defence. If we looked a bit 'non-threatening' against them, how do you think we'll do in the remaining 4 against much better defences?
 
You can use whatever word you like - but if a player is always berated for something irrespective of context and actual reality - then surely something else is going on

Like you with Ekotto, or Adebayor himself you mean? Or perhaps Brad Friedel?
 
And what exactly does he do with those touches? Is he bringing others into play? Setting up goals or even being involved in the buildup? Personally I don't see a massive difference in a player not touching the ball much versus a player touching the ball more and the ball ricocheting into touch.

Definitely this. Ade keeps possession, keeps it simple, and with him Bale/Dempsey/Siggy score the goals. Defoe justs blasts balls into row z and we're right back on the defensive again.
 
You have a very selective memory. Are you only counting the games where you feel Ade has played well in or Defoe has played badly in?

To decide which player is in better form isn't it best to look at the most recent games? Defoe hasn't played well in any game apart from the short spells as a sub against Arse and City.
 
Like you with Ekotto, or Adebayor himself you mean? Or perhaps Brad Friedel?

I think Ekotto is an average player but always recognise his good games and would definitely have him ahead of right-footed Naughton for the rest of the season

Whereas the anti-Defoe crowd will NEVER accept this man in our team.

I regard Friedel as inferior to Lloris - not sure that was ever an argument really?
 
Basically, we could play a striker who plays 5 out of 10's and is more likely to score, or play a striker who gives us 6 out of 10's but couldn't score in a brothel.

Yes, because our other players do better with Adebayor out there. It's not necessarily about what he does or doesn't do, we just look better as a team.
 
Back