Grays_1890
David Ginola
Course he is, he is their player still.
Shows a good attitude
Shows a good attitude
-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Morgan Gibbs-White
- Thread starter Daisuk
- Start date
Robbo
Ian Walker
Wonder if Forest will drop their legal complaints if he tears his ACL today.
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
My mate was going on and on about it
I said he is still a Forest player, he should train and play, shows he isn't a dingdong too
Or he has said, you let me go and I won't be a taco about it.
Grays_1890
David Ginola
Kane was captain for us in PS before he left.......I am not sure what people are expecting here
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
I'm expecting us to offer a few more quid and it will be done soon
Bedfordspurs
Graham Roberts
Can’t see what we would offer any more if … if there was a release clause
The fee triggers his release
Bedfordspurs
Graham Roberts
That’s just way too sensible
Glenda's Legs
Ian Walker
But if that release is all tied up with who knew what, when, and how that info was used, and complaints to the PL, if a few £M more gets rid of all that and gives Frank the player he wants, then it might be worth it, annoying as it might be.
Bedfordspurs
Graham Roberts
But if we have done it right… call their bluff
They valued him at £70m
According to rumours
They think that’s the fee
Disagree. You don't let people mug you off. Otherwise everyone will. You end up being a mug.
If we feel we haven't done anything wrong see it out for better or worse.
Glenda's Legs
Ian Walker
I don't think we should pay their £70M valuation and I don't think we would ever let ourselves be mugged off.
We can of course let it play out and see what happens but imo that only works if we know it will be dealt with in a timely matter (and I assume we would have some indication from the PL as to the timeline - if it seems reasonable, then yes, roll the dice and see what happens.).
It's about value rather than cost. There are multiple ways that a deal can be structured to allow both parties to come away happy (or relatively so).
Bedfordspurs
Graham Roberts
I’m a buyer for a living … well director now with a large team in a multi multi $B company
I would never ever let someone get away with a deal if we had done everything right and met the terms. I’d be after blood
The issue here is clearly that they don’t want to lake their best player big fudged up with his contract (been there many times). The key is they haven’t been able to get new terms and that’s a message itself to them
I think there is an arrogance on both sides and it really needs (if we did meet the clauses) MGW to issue a transfer request under protest and he can then pursue Forrest independently for his cut
Sorry if I sound like a dingdong
Last edited:
Or you have a plan b.
It's not about one player. It's about how other clubs deal with you.
Utd are fudged because they kept over paying.
lurker of old
Scott Parker
it really needs (if we did meet the clauses) MGW to issue a transfer request
This. If he wants to come, he can make it happen, as Berbatov etc did when they wanted to leave. If he doesn't want to come, we need to move on...
This. If he wants to come, he can make it happen, as Berbatov etc did when they wanted to leave. If he doesn't want to come, we need to move on...
I disagree, the ball is well and truly in Levy's court. If we've met the release clause and didn't tap him up/ do anything wrong a simple letter requesting the release of MGW as per his contract to both Forest and the EPL should be sufficient.
Otherwise take Forest to court for breach of contract
markysimmo
Johnny nice-tits
What do people make of our continued silence on the matter ??