tottenhamhotspur.com

[Munz]

Its down again

I quite like the new site,not much difference really

 

[totman]

Diegos was better

 

[yiddo2786]

Diegos was better

this

 

[Yiddo]

Think it looks brick.

 

[paxtonwolf]

Its growing on me, but only slowly

 

[nayimfromthehalfwayline]

The OS has been rubbish for years.

Not because of its style or looks - but because its terminally out of date on all information to do with what goes on at the club

 

[nayimfromthehalfwayline]

Also, it doesnt fit my screen, I have to use the scroll bar to reveal the right arrow to page through the options.

The left arrow stops at the first item, instead of cycling all the way through

 

[EJG]

Is it even working at the moment? I've been getting nothing but a page saying "an error has occurred" since yesterday.

Edit: weird, if I go to www.tottenhamhotspur.com it doesn't work, if I go to www.spurs.co.uk it loads.

 

[Jordinho]

Just had a look now and quite frankly it's brick. Could have done with some more testing I think, trying to do too much at once.

 

[Nutter-Naylor]

So long as i can buy tickets on it (& better than the previous OS) i couldn't really give a fudge what it looks like.

 

[PuraVidaMon]

Hate it. So far...

 

[PuraVidaMon]

WAY too busy, looks clunky, and I actually think it appears as though it's gone BACK in technological time. The picture fade looks like it was made with the first-ever version of PhotoShop. Who green-lit this thing? And when will people learn that simple and clean is best. Read: This year's shirts.

 

[Jordinho]

Really only used it for fixtures, but not anymore as it's all messed up. Will just have to find somewhere else to look.

 

[monkeybarry]

oh wow, that is poor

 

[linnet_spur]

It's so fudged up at the moment, really poor form for them to release this, it's clearly not ready

 

[GGyid]

Crashed. Requires a new front end.

 

[Hootnow]

So far, it looks even worse than the previous one and seems to be a lot slower as well. I hope we spent no money on this.

 

[harr1984]

I agree that it's too busy, hopefully there will be modifications. Overall it's not as bad as some are making out though....

 

[papaspur]

I agree that it's too busy, hopefully there will be modifications. Overall it's not as bad as some are making out though....

I agree with this. My biggest gripe so far are the semi-opaque navigation boxes on either side of the content with the arrows in them. Would be so much better if it were transparent, OR actually showed the content that you were scrolling through. Plus, it's an unorganized way of getting the information you need.

 

[he_is_you_know]

I think the site looks worse, and it was pretty poor to begin with. It looks even more garish if you use the NoScript plug-in for Firefox (example). Also, does anyone have the new URL for the RSS feed? Seems to have died since the site was revamped.