• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Official 2023/24 Premier League Thread

That disallowed goal could be important. Quite possible villa taje 3 more points with a game lost against Brighton after playing in europe. Another lost against pool is it and winning their final game. With us possibly taking 9 points and 3 wins, they’d get 4th by a point?
 
You could make a case for Villa not to win any of their last 3 games, or maybe getting one point.

But on current form I would not back us to pick up 8 more points.

That result must give the club a boost, I really really hope we can use it to go and get a win tomorrow. IF, we could pick up 5pts from the next 3, we could have a hell of chance of nicking 4th, but we have to play better
 
Hoddle's a bit dense isn't he? Debating whether he thinks it's a foul or not, it's irrelevant. It's not a clear or obvious foul, so the original call should not be changed at all. Simpleton
 
Kandi1977 said:
Not because of that. Barging into the back of someone has always been a FK. If that goal was given against us, you'd be livid. And don't even bother saying otherwise, because it's the truth.
But in other instances, you are right.
Click to expand...
Barging? He barely touched him, look at Carlos' reaction or lack thereof.. Even he didn't think it was a foul and he was the one being 'barged'
 
jrh said:
Hoddle's a bit dense isn't he? Debating whether he thinks it's a foul or not, it's irrelevant. It's not a clear or obvious foul, so the original call should not be changed at all. Simpleton
Click to expand...
It's a foul. Ref missed it, VAR told him to have another look, he did, and saw it was a FK and correctly gave it. That's VAR working perfectly! Not someone on the screen making the decision. They left it to the on field ref.
 
Kandi1977 said:
It's a foul. Ref missed it, VAR told him to have another look, he did, and saw it was a FK and correctly gave it. That's VAR working perfectly! Not someone on the screen making the decision. They left it to the on field ref.
Click to expand...
That's not how it works and you know it, when they tell them to go to the screen it's decision made for them. You've heard the audio ffs. Stop being disingenuous.

You think that's a foul anywhere on the pitch, every time? It's just not, in no world.. It's not clear and obvious, I'm sorry, but you're wrong.
 
jrh said:
That's not how it works and you know it, when they tell them to go to the screen it's decision made for them. You've heard the audio ffs. Stop being disingenuous.

You think that's a foul anywhere on the pitch, every time? It's just not, in no world.. It's not clear and obvious, I'm sorry, but you're wrong.
Click to expand...
I'm wrong? What was the decision again? So, ref, VAR ref, assistant VAR ref, me (also a ref) and the majority of other people watching it are wrong, and you're right.

Got it!
You are a really weird one!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back