The Case for the Attacking play

[Raziel]

Full video with analysis that highlights some of the stuff I clipped out

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Bishop]

Kane makes any side infinitely better but the core of our problem isn't the players (yes, better players help), it's the tactics. The core of Frank's tactics are crosses, spamming lots and lots of crosses into a box that we don't overload, it simply isn't good. I'm going to borrow from an analysis that I link at the end, that shows this in almost an undeniable way.

Through balls in PL this season (the entirety of season), this has been linked/referenced many times and the conclusion most people come up with is we need a progressive 6, our squad is brick, our players can't pass, so for reference, see below

View attachment 21495

Here's the number of crosses we attempted in same period

View attachment 21496

This isn't about player ability, this is instructions/tactics, and the analysis shows it even worse. In the below our wide player gets the ball, look how open Xavi is in the middle but we spam the ball into the box anyway where we don't have a numerical advantage or free man

View attachment 21497

Same again below, Romero wide open in middle, at top of box (area Frank doesn't use), Spence spams cross into box where there are 4 defenders to our 2 attackers

View attachment 21498

And that's by instruction as the cross heatmap shows, and that is when players have gotten wide open, it doesn't even cover the fact Frank's system has some core flaws with zone 14, lack of pulling the opposition out of shape, lack of having a passing lane always open.

View attachment 21499

Contrast the image above, against Burnley, Spence has ball, there is Xavi or back to play to, when Xavi gets the ball, there is literally no attacking pass, no one on the edge of the box, no overloads or even isolations to play to. Now the image below (last year, and no this isn't about Ange), the exact same amount of players committed to attack but spread, isolating their defenders and offering at least 5 open passes and Bentancur choses a 6th option (dink over the top)

View attachment 21500

To me, these are core tactical flaws, coaching issues and a belief in a data/percentage game brick that is not only poor to watch but not effective at the top level.

I hear what you’re saying about the tactical approach, vis-à-vis going wide rather than centrally. We could certainly use more variety, but it’s kind of obvious why we do this. Still, are you seriously saying that you watch this group of players and actually think they’re capable of playing the passes you’re suggesting???

Have you never noticed the lack of vision that leads to very basic passes into feet 99% of the time? Or the poor weighting of passes, often hit too forcefully or too slowly, and rarely into a player’s running stride? Even when the pass is received, you constantly see the player have to take an initial touch just to get the ball out of their feet before they can even attempt the second action.

Are you genuinely saying that you’ve watched the likes of Gray, Palhinha, Biss, Sarr, Bentancur, Bergvall, and now Gallagher, and thought they were bright, inventive and creative passers of the ball?

This isn’t a new phenomenon under Frank. It’s not primarily down to coaching, it relates to the fundamental abilities and skill sets of the players we have. Coaching can only sharpen the tools you already possess; it cannot manifest abilities that were never there in the first place. The same limitations existed under Ange, and they existed under Conte, even with a different set of players, because we always recruit from the same mould: functional workers whose standout attribute is never passing ability. Occasionally we’ve targeted movers with the ball, like Bergvall, and hybrids like Sarr and Bissouma, but where is the actual passing specialist?

Even in the examples you gave, who the fudge was supposed to play the ball to the player in the positions you pointed out? Do you seriously think that if these very same players just start spamming through balls, it will somehow just work? We see it even now when we attempt passes into space on the wings, they usually have the wrong weight or lack accuracy. We are not capable of playing those passes to any high degree. Period.

So we don’t want a creative 6, because he would become the be-all and end-all of progression in this team, but we do need a deeper 6 to improve the flow of the passing, increase the speed of circulation, and improve the quality of pass selection. In the examples you gave, the attack is already lost and the box is already congested. To play through those tiny gaps, you need truly gifted passers, not just very good ones, but gifted ones and we are a million miles away from that.

To achieve what you actually want, the quality of the passing before we get to those areas needs to be better. That's why we need a creative 6 or a passing 8. That’s what will create space. That’s what creates options. That’s what creates overloads. That’s what creates gaps that even a good passer has a more realistic chance of hitting accurately, rather than the Xavi Hernández, esque passing lanes you’re expecting right now.

None of this is to excuse Frank, but you need a bit of a reality check if you can’t see both the strengths our midfielders do possess and, conversely, the weaknesses that are painfully obvious

 

[braineclipse]

I hear what you’re saying about the tactical approach, vis-à-vis going wide rather than centrally. We could certainly use more variety, but it’s kind of obvious why we do this. Still, are you seriously saying that you watch this group of players and actually think they’re capable of playing the passes you’re suggesting???

Have you never noticed the lack of vision that leads to very basic passes into feet 99% of the time? Or the poor weighting of passes, often hit too forcefully or too slowly, and rarely into a player’s running stride? Even when the pass is received, you constantly see the player have to take an initial touch just to get the ball out of their feet before they can even attempt the second action.

Are you genuinely saying that you’ve watched the likes of Gray, Palhinha, Biss, Sarr, Bentancur, Bergvall, and now Gallagher, and thought they were bright, inventive and creative passers of the ball?

This isn’t a new phenomenon under Frank. It’s not primarily down to coaching, it relates to the fundamental abilities and skill sets of the players we have. Coaching can only sharpen the tools you already possess; it cannot manifest abilities that were never there in the first place. The same limitations existed under Ange, and they existed under Conte, even with a different set of players, because we always recruit from the same mould: functional workers whose standout attribute is never passing ability. Occasionally we’ve targeted movers with the ball, like Bergvall, and hybrids like Sarr and Bissouma, but where is the actual passing specialist?

Even in the examples you gave, who the fudge was supposed to play the ball to the player in the positions you pointed out? Do you seriously think that if these very same players just start spamming through balls, it will somehow just work? We see it even now when we attempt passes into space on the wings, they usually have the wrong weight or lack accuracy. We are not capable of playing those passes to any high degree. Period.

So we don’t want a creative 6, because he would become the be-all and end-all of progression in this team, but we do need a deeper 6 to improve the flow of the passing, increase the speed of circulation, and improve the quality of pass selection. In the examples you gave, the attack is already lost and the box is already congested. To play through those tiny gaps, you need truly gifted passers, not just very good ones, but gifted ones and we are a million miles away from that.

To achieve what you actually want, the quality of the passing before we get to those areas needs to be better. That's why we need a creative 6 or a passing 8. That’s what will create space. That’s what creates options. That’s what creates overloads. That’s what creates gaps that even a good passer has a more realistic chance of hitting accurately, rather than the Xavi Hernández, esque passing lanes you’re expecting right now.

None of this is to excuse Frank, but you need a bit of a reality check if you can’t see both the strengths our midfielders do possess and, conversely, the weaknesses that are painfully obvious

We definitely agree on a quality passer in midfield being something we lack and have lacked for quite a while.

Bergvall isn't an elite passer, but he's well capable of progressing the ball though the middle (with risk), we've seen Bentancur's progressive passing stats essentially halved from last season. Gray isn't an elite passer either and while he has been playing a lot more recently for a while it was Palhinha, Bentancur or Sarr every week who are all worse at those things than Gray.

And while Gray isn't an elite passer he's really good in tight spaces and under pressure, someone who again (with risk) can progress the ball if given the ball in those areas. We mostly don't even when he's on the pitch.

On transfers surely the manager has some say and influence over who we buy. Based on both his record here so far and what he's said I think Paratici does care about getting the manager what he wants. So having these obvious shortcomings in midfield, particularly deep, we sign first Palhinha and then Gallagher. I think that illustrates Frank's priorities and how he wants us to play for now at the very least.