My view too. Can't see anything special about him. He loafs around a bit and fouls. And what is his best position? He's not even close to being as good as any of our midfielders, so what would he add? Very little in my opinion.even they can see sky hate us
Barkley is a decent player, but he's no better than what we have already imo, the English tax would make him a waste of money for us
I've got similar concerns about Barkley. He can look useful enough on his day, but considering the hype that surrounded him as a 19/20 year-old, you'd really have to say he's rarely been able to show what all the fuss was about. Maybe the 'Next Paul Gascoigne' tag was always going to be impossible to live up to, and maybe with the right coaching he'd still be capable of kicking up a gear, but who knows? If Pochettino fancies him, fair enough, but to me, he has that air of a player with a great future behind him.
I've got similar concerns about Barkley. He can look useful enough on his day, but considering the hype that surrounded him as a 19/20 year-old, you'd really have to say he's rarely been able to show what all the fuss was about. Maybe the 'Next Paul Gascoigne' tag was always going to be impossible to live up to, and maybe with the right coaching he'd still be capable of kicking up a gear, but who knows? If Pochettino fancies him, fair enough, but to me, he has that air of a player with a great future behind him.
Bumper contract could certainly leave him erect, I guess.
Barclay has the tools still to become a good player, he would slot in with us nicely as we have a system of people knowing their jobs and doing them well and adding their own element of xfactor to the role. I think if he came in and you said to him, this is your role and drill him like we have every other Spurs player he would be very welcome
He's stagnated, not a very intelligent player, and was overhyped to begin with ...
Very hard to turn around a player that has plateaued for a significant period of time, add in his cost, he's like the pox ... just stay away.
Barkley wouldn't even provide competition for Carrol!Eriksen needs competition for his place but other than at its a pointless transfer for us and him.
Who d o people believe is faster: Barkley or Sissoko?
Maybe not a popular opinion, but I think that Barkley is exactly the type of player that would thrive within our squad and that Pochettino could improve massively. He's a versatile, athletic player with a rare skill of driving forward through midfield and moving defenders around. His work in the final third is really poor, but he just turned 23 and has so much more capacity to improve than Sissoko.
Dembele's career was looking like stalling out before Poch came in, and he's now one of the best players in his position in world football. Not saying that Barkley is as good as Dembele, but he's got a lot of potential and has been working for really poor managers, IMO.
I'd love it if we could sell Sissoko and bring in Barkley (which is probably pretty unlikely in January), but I'm hopeful that we'll come back for him in the summer. Maybe we can snatch Deulofeu too.
Maybe not a popular opinion, but I think that Barkley is exactly the type of player that would thrive within our squad and that Pochettino could improve massively. He's a versatile, athletic player with a rare skill of driving forward through midfield and moving defenders around. His work in the final third is really poor, but he just turned 23 and has so much more capacity to improve than Sissoko.
Dembele's career was looking like stalling out before Poch came in, and he's now one of the best players in his position in world football. Not saying that Barkley is as good as Dembele, but he's got a lot of potential and has been working for really poor managers, IMO.
I'd love it if we could sell Sissoko and bring in Barkley (which is probably pretty unlikely in January), but I'm hopeful that we'll come back for him in the summer. Maybe we can snatch Deulofeu too.