• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Richarlison

SteveAWOL said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...
thats a very slippery slope he's on there, that kind of comment, a quick way to lose respect

managers are supposed to protect their players in public, there will be a few others in the squad wondering who is next under the bus

he should also remember we lost 3-0 with his system and his preparation, a game he spent 2 months preparing for, he should beware of hubris, and hanging petards, lest he may be hoist upon his own
 
Baleforce said:
thats a very slippery slope he's on there, that kind of comment, a quick way to lose respect

managers are supposed to protect their players in public, there will be a few others in the squad wondering who is next under the bus

he should also remember we lost 3-0 with his system and his preparation, a game he spent 2 months preparing for, he should beware of hubris, and hanging petards, lest he may be hoist upon his own
Click to expand...

Difficult to argue with that tbf...
 
Not a fan of the manager dragging this out in the press tbh - should be drawing a line under it, not adding fuel to the fire.

Don't know what the crack is with other countries windows but i think the club should just pay up his contract at this point and then we can all move on from it.

It will hang around like a bad cloud until we turn things around on the pitch.
 
ShipOfGoldblum said:
He shouldn’t be allowed near live microphones really.
Click to expand...

Baleforce said:
I mean, hope nobody leans too hard into the Venn diagram of player behaviour he’s commented on in press conferences over his career hey…
Click to expand...
Give it a rest, they are footballers and managers, who've worked their bollox off to reach the highest (and extremely competitive) levels of kicking a ball around on a patch of grass. Not purveyors of impeccable morals and behaviour like you two obviously are.
 
Baleforce said:
thats a very slippery slope he's on there, that kind of comment, a quick way to lose respect

managers are supposed to protect their players in public, there will be a few others in the squad wondering who is next under the bus

he should also remember we lost 3-0 with his system and his preparation, a game he spent 2 months preparing for, he should beware of hubris, and hanging petards, lest he may be hoist upon his own
Click to expand...

Maybe the players that we do have might started getting a bit annoyed with a prevailing narrative that Richy is the saviour of this team, when actually they just need the time to acclimate to this system? Maybe RDZ is protecting them by saying this?
 
thfcsteff said:
I'll take a punt at this.

Romero - the club knew since late last season he wanted out. We can discuss reasons another time!

Spence - DeZerbi said they had a chat at the end of last season and Spence was very clear as was RDZ. Porro is a world cup winner.

Danso - probably the only player whose circumstance was similar in so much as he was a late departure. I'd guess he was much more straight-forward. As a person he always projects as very steady. A clear expression of disappointment and a willing buyer.

Brennan - Frank and our DoF made it very clear they didn't want him. He is also a character who is not especially volatile, plus I suspect jis father is a strong advisor. But again, it was a very clear map; we don't want you. And there was a willing buyer. And we wanted to make the 'statement' that we could be a 'selling club'

Vicario - clear since the end of the season

Vuskovic - an agent who aggressively made it clear his client felt he deserved regular PL football at 19 years old having never played in it. Good for them! We found a solution that suited all parties quickly. But clarity again.

Richy - muddy waters all summer, manager obviously liked him and wanted a higher grade replacement, we thought we'd boost our forward line considerably in the final week or so
and it was clear if we did, we'd look to punt him out. It was odd to me that once it was clear Ndiaye's agent was going to hold out for City that we didn't still do a deal with Everton; it suggested to me that the club and Richy would elect to get on with it until Jan and try again. Instead the whole thing got played out in public.

The first comments on Richy came from
RDZ saying Richy was indecisive on his plans. He said it twice. It was a line taken. That caused the reaction IMO.

It was all unnecessary IMO and came as a result of lack of clarity on the player's situation.
Quite why people are upset that the player defended himself is beyond me. The whole thing is messy, there are no heroes or villains here, albeit I think the ultimate responsibility to manage this situation lay with the club and they decided to do what they have done.
Click to expand...

Maybe RDZ went public on Richy’s indecisiveness because it was that exact sort of unseriousness which frustrated him and the club, and hampered their ability to do business with him earlier? And maybe that was why he was brought onto the tour? And why we let Lankshear go?

I think a lot of the criticism of the club comes from the idea that it was ok for Richy to be constantly changing his mind, and for the big assumption that there was something obvious we could have done to make the Everton move go through, even though the player took to social media to explain that he wasn’t going to be pushed around in the market anymore.

Like…maybe Richy was actually indecisive and maybe that is actually a real issue? Bergval said he wanted to go, and was convinced to stay. Maybe Richy said he wanted to go, then stay, and then wanted to go again. And maybe that’s just one too many turns around for the club to be comfortable dealing with.

You may be right that we sort of viewed Richy as a ‘we like you but if someone better comes along we’ll sell you’ but that cuts against the fact that we asked him to extend his contract supposedly. I think if we asked for his commitment and he gave it, I’d be shocked if we then sold him for anything that wasn’t a too good to turn down offer.

I think the club just found the constant changing of his mind unacceptable and probably unprofessional. And then taking to social media to speak out about a deal they facilitated for him to a club he loves, after he’d asked to go, to be absolutely unprofessional. It’s the kind of crap Romero was doing and was part of the reason we were not a serious club for the last few years.

I also note that tonight Vasco came out and said that it was very much Richy choosing not to complete the deal. He just seems like a petulant kid to me. Wanted everything his way, didn’t understand the reality of the situation, and is now suffering more than anyone because of his own outbursts and bad decision making.
 
SissokoWasGood (BoL) said:
Maybe the players that we do have might started getting a bit annoyed with a prevailing narrative that Richy is the saviour of this team, when actually they just need the time to acclimate to this system? Maybe RDZ is protecting them by saying this?
Click to expand...

that is not the prevailing narrative

the only person RDZ is trying to protect here is himself
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back