• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

*** OMT Tottenham Hotspur v Hull City, Sunday 27th October***

we are a bunch of ****ing glory players, each playing their own game to look as good as they can. No team motive whatsoever.

A better option on? **** no im a Spurs player, ill go it alone.
 
Armchair Expert said:
it doesn't seem to matter if we have decent players or not though. its just such a mess.
Click to expand...

We've got decent players, we just need Hudd--or a player like him - as a playmaker. And for AVB to be less cautious.

Hopefully we will still win, but something is fundamentally wrong with the tactics and way we are being set up to play at the moment.
 
ringo said:
We've got decent players, we just need Hudd--or a player like him - as a playmaker. And for AVB to be less cautious.

Hopefully we will still win, but something is fundamentally wrong with the tactics and way we are being set up to play at the moment.
Click to expand...

Yeah I agree. After Modric left I thought we'd after a like for like. I then thought ok lets see how it goes with a team based on pace and power, Chelsea like, but it seems just a devoid of philosophy as ever. I really don't understand which direction the team is supposed to be heading.

I think we can all agree the team is less than the sum of its parts.
 
Armchair Expert said:
Palace didn't look better than Arsenal. If you think that getting outplayed at home by a thread bare Hull side who should have had a penalty is fine then great.
Click to expand...

okay, would have been better if i said this is a hull team that outplayed Chelsea and were unlucky to lose to City?
 
Guys, this is the patient game we have played successfully in the past against against the teams that park their bus. It's the only way through them. Under Arry we kept knocking (and it was better viewing) but they never let us in. Just relax.
 
Mumorn said:
okay, would have been better if i said this is a hull team that outplayed Chelsea and were unlucky to lose to City?
Click to expand...

Yeah fair enough. I don't think anyone is expecting us to turn up and simply turn over Hull and win by four. But our pitch looks so congested it could be a five a side pitch. Other teams seem to spread it round in space, where as WHL looks like its the back of a postage stamp. Why is everything always so congested?

Is Anfield three times the size of WHL? Its just a tangible lack of improvement that is beginning to irk some I think.
 
Papercut said:
Guys, this is the patient game we have played successfully in the past against against the teams that park their bus. It's the only way through them. Under Arry we kept knocking (and it was better viewing) but they never let us in. Just relax.
Click to expand...

NEVER!

The end is near, relegation a certainty. AVB out.
 
Mumorn said:
okay, would have been better if i said this is a hull team that outplayed Chelsea and were unlucky to lose to City?
Click to expand...

Or how about we dont care what they did against others and only care about what we do against them? Perhaps thats just so so much better. Who cares what other teams do - history does not dictate what happens in future. Just because we lost against **** does not mean we will lose against them next game etc etc etc
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back