• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

OMT Spurs v Athletico

thats a valid point, but he did pick Kinsky, and that was guaranteed to result in being 3/4 goals down at HT.
That's a lot, I would never pick Kinsky tbh. He can't fudging save a shot but the clamour was for Vicario to be dropped because he has himself been awful pretty much all season. So it's a bit of a rock and hard place but yeah, I wouldn't have started Kinsky.
 
We haven't actually played poorly and their first 3 goals were directly on the players. Is that worth sacking him? We are playing well...we just have shambles players.
He continues to play with a back 3 which in practice is a back 5. We are then left with just 2 in central midfield. Zero creativity plus he thought Kinsky was an upgrade, so yeah it is fecking worth sacking him.

And we looked better under Frank, so yeah, it is fecking well worth sacking him.
 
That's a lot, I would never pick Kinsky tbh. He can't fudging save a shot but the clamour was for Vicario to be dropped because he has himself been awful pretty much all season. So it's a bit of a rock and hard place but yeah, I wouldn't have started Kinsky.

it's all relative, statistically Vic is still way in profit with the amount of goals he has stopped based on xG of shots saved

the data did not back this decision up
 
Back