• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Mighty Spurs vs. Emirates Marketing Project

They are taken from Who Scored and think that they are voted on in match

I think they are stat based, but the weighting of different stats can skew things, like Lamela's miss. There two West Ham players in their team of the week and that was a terrible game.
 
14462900_661285030696838_2280692362264025490_n.png
 
Just watching motd and is why is no one picking up on stones daydreaming at the second goal when the rest of the city step and he's standing there like a lamppost?
 
I think they are stat based, but the weighting of different stats can skew things, like Lamela's miss. There two West Ham players in their team of the week and that was a terrible game.
Assuming he would otherwise have rated 7 that's two points deducted for the miss. The shot was on target ffs, had the goalie dived the wrong way he'd have scored.

No wonder GG doesn't fart about with ratings anymore.
 
They said Lamela had a poor game yet he was involved in both goals, a crucial pick up of a loose ball and quick release to start the counter for the second.
Wasn't his best game but he wasn't poor.
 
They said Lamela had a poor game yet he was involved in both goals, a crucial pick up of a loose ball and quick release to start the counter for the second.
Wasn't his best game but he wasn't poor.


Simple analysis of missing a penalty automatically overlooks any other contribution. It's easier to write.
 
They said Lamela had a poor game yet he was involved in both goals, a crucial pick up of a loose ball and quick release to start the counter for the second.
Wasn't his best game but he wasn't poor.

He had a great game as usual. Who gives a brick some fudging algorithm on a stats for dummies website whoscored.com give him -2 for the keeper going the right way for a penalty. They didn't give Son a -3 for being a greedy clam and acting as if his teammate was gonna miss the penalty.

As for City they aren't as good as Liverpool, Everton or Monaco based on this. They've beaten no one yet neither, only the bottom 4 in the league, 13th and 6th.
 
The only gutting thing about this game...we have to wait 2 weeks for the next one!
 
Last edited:
He had a great game as usual. Who gives a brick some fudgeing algorithm on a stats for dummies website whoscored.com give him -2 for the keeper going the right way for a penalty. They didn't give Son a -3 for being a greedy clam and acting as if his teammate was gonna miss the penalty.

.


Not me for sure.
 
Back