• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Igor the Interim

There are always rumours and whispers floating around any business, especially when said business is in the public eye as much as football.
And there will always be people that let nefarious leaks out, if often to serve their own purpose.

But the idea that Lange and therefore were still backing Frank isn't exactly far fetched is it?
He arguably should have been sacked at least twice before they finally gave him the Spanish archer.
Add in that Fab joined and left a couple of months later, and he definitely wanted Frank gone in December, in all seems completely plausible really.

It's not about being far fetched as any rumour seems plausible in isolation. It's the sheer volume and the way that the conjecture is used as a stick to beat guys like Lange. It's like listening to Trump say something is true when you know it blatantly isn't. It then becomes true because that p_rick said it in the eyes of the gullible majority.

In corporations you have to work from the inside out on this stuff. For Spurs, it should start with the manager, the players and the immediate leadership team of Vinai, Johan etc. If info is getting out from any of them then they need to be identified and reminded that our culture will not tolerate it. It should also be contractual where possible.
 
Back