NaijaSpurs
Les Ferdinand
Yep but Chelsea but a contract forward to Mason and he rejected it
Which is what players tend to do when they feel they are being low balled.
Yep but Chelsea but a contract forward to Mason and he rejected it
That's all good and fine but Mason mount has resale value even if he is over rated
Which is what players tend to do when they feel they are being low balled.
Or just greedy
Only hindsight will tell. Either way, there'll be plenty criticising the club's hierarchy for whichever decision they make.
If I offered you top 4 for £100m, would you take it? Seems cheap given that's just 3 "decent" signings these days.
Selling Kane could be really useful in the rebuild. Perhaps his goals have been masking poor management and/or a humdrum midfield. But then, we all remember the hash we made of the Bale money. Eriksen and Lamela aside, of course.
I just hope that, whatever happens, Levy and Ange have a plan.
Kane here massively changes everything that every manager does because he is that goodOnly hindsight will tell. Either way, there'll be plenty criticising the club's hierarchy for whichever decision they make.
If I offered you top 4 for £100m, would you take it? Seems cheap given that's just 3 "decent" signings these days.
Selling Kane could be really useful in the rebuild. Perhaps his goals have been masking poor management and/or a humdrum midfield. But then, we all remember the hash we made of the Bale money. Eriksen and Lamela aside, of course.
I just hope that, whatever happens, Levy and Ange have a plan.
Kane in Germany would be IMO like cheat mode as the teams are just not as a good
Would you prefer world class players or a world class team?Keep him as long as we can. Imo. Far, far too good to lose. Simple as that. I know it isn’t actually that simple but we have a truly world class player on our hands, let’s keep him while we can. Then maybe he deserves to go on a free.
Kane is my favourite player, but I'm not that worried. Judging by our recruitment the past year or two we are actually much better at identifying players for succession planning. Add into the fact we already have Son who is proven at playing CF when Kane isn't around and doing a decent job and Richi. Plus we have a very attack minded manager which means we won't have such an over reliance on Kane to create and score everything. I'd prefer him to stay, but I trust we will respond well to losing him....
But…Son I kind of agree with. He can play CF but that means whoever replaces him in his position isn’t at good. Not convinced about Richarlison tbh but accept he may come good under Ange. Not just his goals, Kane is an assist machine and creates a lot of our chances.
That's my point though, under this manager we won't be reliant on Kane to create - one of the very first things he has done is sign a creative midfielder in Maddison. Before we have just had work horses in CM, that's not happening under Ange. Whilst Kanes abilities are obviously still going to be beneficial, I can guarantee this season we will be creating and scoring from all over the pitch rather than last season where we was massively relying on Kane to do both.....Son I kind of agree with. He can play CF but that means whoever replaces him in his position isn’t at good. Not convinced about Richarlison tbh but accept he may come good under Ange. Not just his goals, Kane is an assist machine and creates a lot of our chances.
That's my point though, under this manager we won't be reliant on Kane to create - one of the very first things he has done is sign a creative midfielder in Maddison. Before we have just had work horses in CM, that's not happening under Ange. Whilst Kanes abilities are obviously still going to be beneficial, I can guarantee this season we will be creating and scoring from all over the pitch rather than last season where we was massively relying on Kane to do both.....
I think you need to look at it differently
- We have a new manager who is going to play a completely new system and style
- We already will need to change a minimum of 3 starters, one of which is GK (imo, one of the more difficult replacements)
- Having Kane in side will likely ensure easier start for manager as well as improve chances for Europe next season (£ value in itself)
In that context, keeping Harry for another season even if we lose out completely on the sale vastly improves Ange's chance of success and speed to settling in, gives us a much better shot at Europe revenue next season and gives Ange opportunity to work with goal output of Son, Deki, Richi, Maddison (?) while still having Kane.
Outside of an outright stupid offer, I'd argue keeping is the obvious right choice.
Harry Redknapp say: he knows Kane is staying
Has Redknapp said anything about it?