• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Oh it seems bentancurs agents (back sports s.a) only have him as a client. They had 4 more all of whom are retired. None of whom ever played in portugal. So very unlikely they have a portugese arm.
 
The Athletic said:
There has been plenty of interest in investing in Tottenham Hotspur in recent years but no would-be investor has received the welcome Forrest Li got in December.

Not only was he Daniel Levy’s guest at a home game but Li was put up at the Tottenham training ground afterwards, and introduced to senior staff and players.

It was the full red-carpet treatment, more than Levy has put on for any other potential investor before. And it has got people at Tottenham wondering whether Li, one of the richest men in Singapore, could be about to become their new boss.

If Li wanted to buy Tottenham outright, the 44-year-old billionaire would have to get very, very close to what the club’s current owners ENIC think it is worth, as the Bahamas-registered investment firm does not need to sell. That price tag is understood to be £3 billion: £2.3 billion for the shares, plus £700 million of debt.

While Li is rich enough to do that, he is more likely to start with a minority stake — £3 billion is a scary number for anyone to write on a cheque and even the biggest hitters tend to do these things in instalments. The staged investments in Leeds United and West Ham United are good recent examples of this trend.

A gradual divestment is an idea that ENIC founder Joe Lewis and his partner Levy have been considering for some time, strengthening the club’s finances while not ending their 21 years of control. But whatever happens between Li and ENIC — and we should point out that both sides have denied that they have discussed an investment, as is always the case even when there are talks — his apparent interest raises one of the most important questions around the club in recent years: are Tottenham Hotspur really for sale?

The answer to that depends on your definition of “for sale”. The club would certainly not describe themselves that way, and there is certainly no urgency to find a buyer or sell up. Levy is the longest-serving chairman in the Premier League, and there is no suggestion that he is touting the club around.

But, at the same time, speak to any source familiar with Levy’s long-term thinking — and The Athletic has spoken to many — and they will all say ENIC has built up Tottenham in order to one day sell it. And that Levy and Lewis have been willing to speak to prospective investors about a potential sale, although none have gone public with their interest since US bank Cain Hoy in 2014.

“It has always been a question of when,” says a source close to Levy and Lewis. “Daniel has said that he is building this to sell it. But there’s hardly a club in the Premier League that isn’t for sale at the right price.”

Another potential investor into Tottenham said that while the whole club might not be on the market, the sale of a minority stake, leaving Levy in charge, is in play at this point.

“It’s always been for sale,” says another well-placed source, “and Daniel has always been open to discussions.” (It is also worth pointing out that because Tottenham have shareholders that if any interested party does approach them, they are obliged to consider it.)

Some of those discussions have, in fact, come close to a deal. In 2019, for example, American businessman Todd Boehly, who also looked at Chelsea, led a group that was in advanced negotiations to buy the club for approximately £2.3 billion, although no final agreement was reached.

One very experienced club broker told us “Spurs are 100 per cent for sale”, while another source, who has been involved in takeover talks with ENIC, said “they’re definitely more in play now than they have been”.

If Levy does want to talk turkey, he and Lewis would make a huge profit on their investment. Whatever fans might think about their management of the football side of the business, there is no question they have built Tottenham into something far more valuable than it was in 2000, when they bought 29.9 per cent of the club from Alan Sugar for £22 million. That deal valued the club at £80 million.

How much more valuable it is now, though, is a matter of some debate. In his most recent survey of Premier League club valuations, the University of Liverpool’s football finance expert Kieran Maguire gave Tottenham the top spot, at £2.7 billion. But early last year, global financial services firm KPMG put a price tag of £1.5 billion on the north London side, only for US business magazine Forbes to push that out to £1.7 billion in its annual ranking of football’s most valuable clubs a few months later.

How you value businesses as unusual as Premier League football clubs often comes down to who is selling and why, and who is buying and why. ENIC has been an active player in the football industry since the mid-1990s, so there is not much mystery there: Lewis and Levy will not sell unless someone makes them an offer they really like and any sale would be the culmination of more than 20 years’ work.

“We chose football,” Levy explained when ENIC first started buying stakes in clubs, “because it is the most popular sport on earth, and the biggest money-spinner.”

It is also more fun than investing in corporate bonds or unit trusts, which is why there will always be a line of wealthy people who want to buy a club like Tottenham, but right now Li seems to be at the front of the queue.

Born in China, the US-educated tech tycoon is the chairman and CEO of Sea, an e-commerce and gaming business based in Singapore but listed on the New York Stock Exchange, where it was doing very nicely until October. In April 2020, as the world entered lockdown, Sea’s shares were worth 42 cents each. A year and a half later, they peaked at $3.58, an increase of 750 per cent.

At that point, Li was worth north of $20 billion (£15 billion) but paper wealth can be fleeting and Sea’s share price has plummeted since November, when Chinese entertainment and technology conglomerate Tencent started to sell chunks of its large holding in the company. As of last week, Sea’s shares were trading for $1.28 and Forbes had adjusted Li’s “real-time net worth” to $7.5 billion (£5.6 billion).

No need to start a collection for him then, but we can reasonably wonder if Li’s window for buying some or all of Tottenham has slammed shut for the time being.

The Athletic is aware of other suitors, though, with the name of one prominent American family cropping up several times. We have asked this particular family if the rumours are true and they have strongly denied them, so, we will not name them now but we will be paying close attention to their next moves in the sport and entertainment space.

And they are not the only wealthy Americans with designs on European football, far from it. As already mentioned, Boehly’s name comes up in conversations about club takeovers every other month. He already owns a fifth of baseball’s Los Angeles Dodgers and more than a quarter of basketball’s LA Lakers.

One US-based source described Boehly, who studied at the London School of Economics, as a “sports nut who has more money than he knows what to with”.

But even aside from Boehly, Levy has held talks over the years with Robert Kraft, owner of the NFL’s New England Patriots and Stephen Ross of the Miami Dolphins, as well as Frank McCourt, who used to own the Dodgers and now owns Ligue 1 side Marseille. Although sources have denied these were about a potential sale, others say that these discussions could have simply been about other topics, such as sponsorship and partnership opportunities.
 
The Athletic said:
Tottenham, who lost £80 million before tax last season, would clearly be an expensive investment — and there are legitimate questions about how many buyers of £3 billion assets there are in the post-COVID world — but the club would still be a hugely attractive asset to someone. As well as the previously mentioned investments in Leeds and West Ham, and the Saudi-funded takeover of Saudi Sportswashing Machine, there have also been full or partial takeovers at Burnley, Crystal Palace and Southampton during the pandemic. The dream factory has not shut down.

Any investment prospectus for Tottenham would include the following. Over the last decade, they have built themselves a £50-million training ground and £1.2-billion stadium, each of which can claim to be best in class.

Far bigger than Stamford Bridge and 13 years newer than The Emirates, the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium is maybe the most attractive thing going for the club and at the heart of Levy’s pitch that Tottenham, rather than Arsenal or Chelsea, are London’s club of the future.

But the point of the stadium is not just to do with prestige, it also guarantees the first thing any potential investor would look for: annual revenue. Tottenham bring in roughly £6 million for every home game. They have made a big bet on persuading fans to spend more time at the ground, which is why not being able to fill the stadium from March 2020 to August 2021 was so damaging, costing them an estimated £200 million in lost earnings. But now Tottenham can fill the stadium again, the money is flowing in.

On top of the money Tottenham make on match days, the stadium is able to host lucrative non-football events again. Rugby union is coming back during the March international break (Saracens v Bristol), then rugby league’s Challenge Cup final will be held there on 28 May. Guns N’ Roses are also due to play two nights at the stadium in July.

But the most significant extra events Tottenham can now put on in their ever-so-clever home are NFL games. Levy has worked tirelessly to make Tottenham the home of American football in the UK. The stadium has a retractable NFL-friendly pitch and has hosted four fixtures of America’s favourite sports league, two in October 2019 and two in October 2021. If, as many hope, an NFL franchise is ever established in London, Tottenham looks its most likely landlord, which would only add to the club’s value.

Another thing an investor would look for is the size of the customer base and, on this point, Levy has succeeded in growing the club. There is no question Tottenham are a bigger global brand now than they were in the past. Reaching the 2019 Champions League final, appointing Jose Mourinho and Antonio Conte, showcasing the club in an Amazon documentary and hosting NFL games have combined to make Tottenham far better known around the world — and especially in the US — than they were before.

Put all this together and you can see why most market observers think a sale to an American individual or group is the most likely outcome. But there are obvious risks associated with owning a team like Tottenham.

First, there is the debt. According to the most recent set of accounts published in November 2021, it stands at £706 million, up from £605 million a year before. This was largely made up of a £525 million bond issue in 2019 to pay for the stadium, with another £250 million from another private placement in May 2021. While the average interest rate on this debt is 2.7 per cent, a far lower rate than most other teams are paying on their debts, it still amounts to £19 million per year in interest.

Then there is the fact that while Spurs’ Premier League revenue is more or less assured, there are no guarantees of Champions League football: a significant difference-maker in any club’s accounts. While Spurs qualified for four consecutive Champions League seasons under Mauricio Pochettino, they have not played a game in European club football’s most stellar competition for almost two years now.

Conte was appointed to get Spurs back into that company but there are no sure things in a league where Spurs have always been the sixth of the Big Six in terms of spending. The actual rise of Leicester City and West Ham, as well as the potential rise of Aston Villa, Everton and Saudi Sportswashing Machine represent further threats to Spurs’ challenge for a top-four finish.

So while returning to the Champions League is vital to the club, any investor would have to price in the risk of Spurs missing out. It is a source of some frustration among Premier League owners that Major League Soccer teams are trading for more than eight times their revenue, despite earning less from broadcasting than Championship teams, while most teams in England’s top flight go for about twice their annual turnover. The Big Six would command a healthier multiple — perhaps four or five times revenue — but that is still a far smaller mark-up than for teams in MLS, a league with, as yet, limited appeal beyond its borders.

That, of course, is because MLS sides, like teams in every other North American sports league, cannot be relegated, share revenue and talent more evenly and operate under salary caps.

This explains why the European Super League was so attractive to Tottenham and the rest of the Premier League’s aristocrats. While there can be no guarantees when it comes to UEFA’s broadcast income, Tottenham (like Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester United and the rest) would have had an ownership stake in the Super League, giving them more certainty on their incomings and outgoings. From a club value point of view, the Super League was a game-changer.

As we all know, the idea failed and would appear to be off the cards for English clubs for the foreseeable future. But interest in Tottenham remains. Whether there really are enough investors rich and brave enough to commit to purchases as big as Tottenham, two years into a pandemic, we will have to wait and see. ENIC is certainly in no rush to sell, and Levy is naturally keen to make sure that, when the time comes, he is selling to the right people.

So, in the short term, a more likely outcome than selling the whole club would be ENIC selling a stake, bringing in some external investment while not fundamentally transforming the running of the club. There is also speculation that the stadium’s naming rights — still unsold — could be packaged up in any deal. While the circumstances are not quite the same, when US businessman John Textor bought a stake in Crystal Palace last year, he also acquired advertising space at the club’s stadium for his virtual entertainment company Facebank.

And whatever happens with Forrest Li or any other interested party, it does not necessarily mean the Levy era is coming to an end at Tottenham. Because one thing that has come out of his talks with other parties is his interest in staying on as CEO for a guaranteed period of time.

In fact, some sources have said this is a potential obstacle to any sale, as while most new owners would love to be able to call on the 59-year-old’s experience while they learn the ropes, they would eventually want to get their hands on the steering wheel. It seems that how long that might take is just another item to be negotiated… with a man who loves negotiating.

So, whether Tottenham are sold tomorrow, next year or next decade, fans frustrated with Levy’s stewardship of the club should not expect to see him sail off to the Caribbean until he is absolutely ready.
 

The family i can only think of the waltons (owners of walmart). The kochs you wouldn't say family, it's only 2 of them. The others hate each other.
 
The family i can only think of the waltons (owners of walmart). The kochs you wouldn't say family, it's only 2 of them. The others hate each other.
Can't see it. I don't think the Waltons own any sports teams at present (and the article suggests a family who have sports teams already). Also one of the Walton fortune's heirs (Ann Walton) is married to Stan Kroenke who owns Arsenal.

Steve Ballmer or Robert Kraft might be the most likely candidates of the US sports club owners but you wouldn't describe either as 'families'.

There are a load of super rich US families (Mars, Lauder, Johnson (2 of these both worth over $30b, Newhouse, Pritzker, Cargill-MacMillan) but none of them seem to own sports teams or be a good natural fit.

The only US wealthy family that might be a good fit on the surface is the Cox family, seeing as their business is media. However when delving deeper they sold most of their broadcasting assets and now concentrate on their US IP network.
 
Last edited:
Back