• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Conor Gallagher

If we avoid relegation and finally sign a ball-playing CMF plus a left footer (with a bit more experience than some talented Brazilian teenager) then perhaps Gallagher will come good but he’s not what this squad needed in January.
If we sign a ball playing 8 where is Gallagher going to play? He's not quite a DM either, so a strange signing imo considering our more obvious weaknesses. He comes across like a Levy (but no Levy) special ie. A deal to be had but no thoughts as to how he actually fixes a gap.

I don't dislike him as a player but I've never particularly wanted him mainly because he doesn't really address any of our faults.
 
Looked shattered yesterday. Was still running, but had the running style of an exhausted Scott Parker out there.

He was poor, no doubt. But I'm guessing that's partly fitness/inury/similar problems and that this also contributed to how poor he was on the ball.
It beggars belief that him and others seem tired. They play once a week and have to run around for 95 minutes. Really only about 50 considering the time for throw ins, goal kicks etc . They are in the prime of their lives.
I dont buy this tired bullcrap. They just arent putting in 100 %.
 
I was totally against the signing of Gallagher from day one. He is not the reason we are a poor team but he does not improve us. He runs about alot but offensively he gives us nothing.
 
That’s a damning indictment of the shambolic state we’re in, that our highest paid player hasn’t won a game at nWHL since Pochettino last visited it with Chelsea!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I did not want Gallagher in the first place, and I have seen nothing to suggest I was wrong to hold that view. He cannot pass, he cannot create and ge cannot beat a man with pace or skill.
 
You can tell we are run by a bunch of clowns when you consider such an ordinary player is our most highly paid player
Can't see how he's good enough to be our highest paid player. But also think he's a very good player. But he was never the solution to our problems this season and although somewhat better than some of those other options in midfield he's essentially one of several decent/good options of many for a role we're overstocked on while having no options for other roles.

If we somehow survive and somehow manage to balance the squad come the summer he could be really good for us. But still not worth being our highest paid player.
 
Back