Bad pundit world cup - Phil Thompson v Tony Gale

[milo]

Our third second round game sees Phil Thompson take on Tony Gale.

 

[Lemonade Money]

Gale!

 

[Mikey10]

Thompson every time. A talker of gonad*s par excellence and Don of the Scouse mafia.

 

[Gazza Dazzla]

Wow tough one. I actually sat through Tony gale do the WBA v WHU game yesterday and he was ok to be fair, I was stunned!

Think I'll stick with Gale though, too little too late.

 

[paxtonwolf]

I know its a tough one. But for those choosing Thompson, you really need to watch a Spurs match online when Gale is commentating. It would be a no-brainer vote then

 

[Lemonade Money]

Can't believe Gale isn't walking this. Him and Tyler are my picks for the crown of crimes against commentating. Most of the others are just idiots.

 

[Baleforce]

heavyweights

despite long playing careers neither of them have even the slightest understanding of the game

 

[parklane1]

The nose.

 

[Gazza Dazzla]

Can't believe Gale isn't walking this. Him and Tyler are my picks for the crown of crimes against commentating. Most of the others are just idiots.

Slightly concerned that Gale isn't winning this with only a few hours left, I can only imagine it's that some haven't had the pleasure of his commentary like you say?

 

[Spur of the moment]

Thompson's saving grace is he has something of a soft spot for Spurs. Tony Gale on the other hand is plain loathsome.

 

[milo]

The vote is really tight and you have three hours to make sure that the biggest stain on football coverage goes through to the quarter finals.

 

[milo]

I want to change my vote. I have just been looking at his Wikipedia page and saw that Tony Gale named his son Tony.

 

[Rorschach]

Gale's bias is hard to listen to as it is...well..unadulterated bias. When he has no horse in the race he is as banal as the rest. Also his voice reminds of Bradley Walsh.
Thompson though is barely sentient and his opinions as are inciteful as those of a blob fish, which coincidentally he resembles.

Hard choice.

 

[parklane1]

Gale's bias is hard to listen to as it is...well..unadulterated bias. When he has no horse in the race he is as banal as the rest. Also his voice reminds of Bradley Walsh.
Thompson though is barely sentient and his opinions as are inciteful as those of a blob fish, which coincidentally he resembles.

Hard choice.

Going a bit off topic i know but i can not stand Bradley Walsh, any guy who laughs at their own jokes as much as he does is a taco.

 

[milo]

After trailing for most of the time, Gale sneaks through by a whisker at the death.

 

[Mikey10]

Really? REALLY????? I had Thompson nailed on as overall winner.

 

[JerusalemMan]

Is there no way for them both to lose?

 

[Baleforce]

Is there no way for them both to lose?

they do, every single day of their lives

 

[scaramanga]

they do, every single day of their lives

I think you'll find it's us that lose, every day they exist.

 

[Kandi1977]

Is there no way for them both to lose?

Going through in this competition is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time.