• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Kit Thread

Rossi22 said:
BOWeIysCcAAzsfO.jpg:large
Click to expand...

That sponsor ruins what looks to be a good kit.
 
It's just a fan made one, here's a closer one(although the bit under the collar doesn't look as thick to me in the Bale pic)

tottmock2.jpg
 
I can't even quantify how much better it is with the navy blue logo. It's a brick kit with light blue, turning into one of our best ever with the navy blue. What the sponsor wants the sponsor gets I suppose.
 
I will not buy it with the baby blue. Its horrid. Hopefully the away kit is better and the sponsor is a better fit in terms of colours.

The fake tie looks brick as well, whats the point of that bit.. I think the action photo looks more like a V-neck with popper type though, and whoever shopped them two kits is blind.
 
BedfordBen said:
I can't even quantify how much better it is with the navy blue logo. It's a brick kit with light blue, turning into one of our best ever with the navy blue. What the sponsor wants the sponsor gets I suppose.
Click to expand...
not necessarily.

This is the official logo of Standard Chartered Bank:

logo_scbank.gif


This is the modified logo for use with LFC:

images


This is on their shirts:

daniel-agger.jpg


and

6-wkl2012.jpg


if you look carefully not only did the sponsors adapt the colours to fit the club outfit - they also changed the height of the words to make it bigger compared to the logo, for greater visibility.
 
Last edited:
ShelfLife said:
Not sure if posted already but saw this on SC. Looks to be the kit that GB is wearing in that 'TV' picture.

tottmock.jpg
Click to expand...

Will prefer if "Hewlett Packet" is spelled in full under the logo, just like it was during the 1995-1999 seasons. It will make the shirt more popular among non-Spurs fans and even non-Sports fans due to it's famous IT company name.
 
Spurs7891 said:
Will prefer if "Hewlett Packet" is spelled in full under the logo, just like it was during the 1995-1999 seasons. It will make the shirt more popular among non-Spurs fans and even non-Sports fans due to it's famous IT company name.
Click to expand...

its comments like this that made them think that shortening it to just "hp" would be better :lol:

_66527873_gary-mabbutt2-getty.jpg
 
I highly doubt the designers would be that stupid to have the logo in the light blue colour, just not classy. Not overly keen on the cowboy tie either...
 
But there was a contrast (red and blue opposite ends of the spectrum I believe?). You can't have 2 shades of blue - it's awful.
 
Papercut said:
But there was a contrast (red and blue opposite ends of the spectrum I believe?). You can't have 2 shades of blue - it's awful.
Click to expand...

I agree about the two shades of blue. I actually think more than two colours is brick. I also dont like the collar - if the shirt had a grandad shirt type colar with a pop up button or two down the middle that would be awesome. Like a friggin kaftan.
 
The club / Under Armour would have no say. HP have branding guidelines that dictate exactly how their logo can and cannot be used. They would like have a primary colour, secondary colour and one colour/black version. If navy blue doesn't fit that, then navy blue won't be used.

Edit: their colours are on page 30 of this guide: http://ctl.tpu.ru/files/casebrandbookHP.pdf

No navy blue, but black would make sense.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back