Rorschach
Bert Bliss
The main theme of the show is the repeated humiliation of Clarkson himself, so it's not all bad.Man who denies climate change is a thing whines about farmers struggling.
Not for me thanks, guv.
The main theme of the show is the repeated humiliation of Clarkson himself, so it's not all bad.Man who denies climate change is a thing whines about farmers struggling.
Not for me thanks, guv.
I do love how people are sucked in by the whole Clarksons Farm stuff. Blokes worth 50m, the whole point is to make more money on TV revenue. But somehow he is being taken on faith of that show.Man who denies climate change is a thing whines about farmers struggling.
Not for me thanks, guv.
Man who denies climate change is a thing whines about farmers struggling.
Not for me thanks, guv.
The only lense you appear to have, is the one that looks backwards. And it's certainly not rose coloured, that we do know.
He's wrong about the last part IMO. With his platform and motoring fan base he could help significantly, if he choose to.He doesn't deny climate change.
He doesn't deny climate change.
Educating the public on subjects they probably know little about?Man who denies climate change is a thing whines about farmers struggling.
Not for me thanks, guv.
He doesn't deny climate change.
Yes it is that. Amazon want a successful show. Clarkson is a tv personality who provides that. (Tbh its more successful than they ever imagined)I do love how people are sucked in by the whole Clarksons Farm stuff. Blokes worth 50m, the whole point is to make more money on TV revenue. But somehow he is being taken on faith of that show.
Oh well.And you have a kaleidoscope of flimflam.
Oh well.
Another who will never sort anything out.
Yes it is that. Amazon want a successful show. Clarkson is a tv personality who provides that. (Tbh its more successful than they ever imagined)
As I've said, he has the safety net of other income, inc Amazons. BUT, that doesn't deny/invalidate the light he shines on the brick circumstances/rules/life most other farmers face day to day. He suffers them too, to be clear.
Do you watch the show? This isn't Clarkson being his stereotyped male chauvinist blokey petrol head.
I don't know the ins and outs of UK farming but it is not about land. Holland is the 2nd biggest exporter of food in the world and is about 17% the size of the UK. It is about choices and priorities. Farmers need to make a profit, though, as you say, so that's where they aim for rather than what the country needs. It is the same in most places thanks to neoliberalism.
Canada doesn't have a lot of arable land, incidentally.
People do change you know. Even maybe just a little bit.I think that you mean he doesn’t deny climate change NOW.
![]()
Jeremy Clarkson’s climate change U-turn after ‘alarming’ experience
JEREMY CLARKSON appeared to make a drastic U-turn on his views on climate change after witnessing first hand the impacts of global warming.www.express.co.uk
Spent years doing it when the science was incontestable. All because he “had a career in the motoring industry.”
He’s a Grade A t wat imo, who has moved from one caraciture (petrolhead) to another (farmer) as a means of grifting a living.
(Anecdotally, my wife grew up in the same village as him. He was known as the biggest di ckhead in Yorkshire long before he became famous.)
People do change you know. Even maybe just a little bit.
I think you're being a bit harsh with categorising him as a 'grifter' ...by modern standards, take a look around man!
Yes. Experience is the best teacher.I think the reality is seeing it first hand impact his farm shows that Climate Change is real, you get peoples attention when they are hit in the pocket
Indeed.
The food security one involves external supply chains, which are pinch points outside the boundaries of the UK. Disruption there will have an immediate impact within days and a potentially catastrophic impact within a week ( 9 meals from anarchy...). You could argue most of the others are somewhat under the control of the government, or could be in an pinch. I just think that food is the soft underbelly of the UKs national security and needs more attention. I'm sure I read recently there are little to no national stockpiles. At least you have a target though (60% sufficency). We don;t even have that over here.
The UK needs to be more self sufficient in multiple areas, most medicines and vaccines for example are made elsewhere - granted we'd still need to import the raw ingredients. There was plans for AZ to invest in a vaccine facility but Labour reduced the support on offer and AZ abandoned it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.