Is it the case with this one that we don't want to sell him whilst his stock in the PL is so low? So we put him to work with a loan fee and then let him build his stock back up in Serie A.
Yep, the younger Friedel was a superb keeper. Pool were having meltdowns getting rid of guys like him and David James in their prime.
As for 2002, all we needed was a referee. Mark Hughes could have walked 4 times in that game. The refereeing was a disgrace, as it often is in these showcase finals, especially with the old pro's.
Were we even in the running for Brad first time around?
Keller was one of the worst keepers I have seen at Spurs
I think it means that the loan fee is undisclosed, and the buy-option is €8m plus some add-ons potentially worth €2m. But it's cryptic.
Neil Sullivan was the worst first choice in the premier league years, he was absolutely awful.I would say only Walker was worse as a long term #1.
Keller would make some unreal saves but was prone to a howler and couldn’t kick. Basically a second rate Gomes.
Neil Sullivan was the worst first choice in the premier league years, he was absolutely awful.
How old are you out of interest?As I understand Jennings is Tottenhams greatest every Goalkeeper and was considered one of the best in the world. Followed by Clemence & Lloris.
I had a Spurs Greatest XI VHS as a kid where Terry Venables picked the team. He chose Ted Ditchburn over Jennings and I can remember the narrator saying nobody else would think that lol.
I went to a goalkeeper camp ran by Jennings and his son Patrick who was the youth team keeper for Spurs at the time. They got me a trial at Spurs who passed on me but also Milwall and they took me on for a period.
A handful of isolated matches, what I mostly remember of him is letting any kind of half decent low shot squirm under or through his body like a slow motion car wrecks.Don’t agree with that at all. Sullivan against Arsenal in the 2001 Semi Final was exceptional. Also kept us in the game 1st leg against Chelsea in 2002.
I had to give him MOTM that day as a guess of PhilipsThey year we made the CL places, he was unstoppable, not seen the likes of it live so often. I was at PSV when he broke our hearts in Europe too, he was like a wall
Is that 8m to loan him then?!?!
How old are you out of interest?
He's coming up to 30 now and will not get rid of the huge flaws in his game. Kinsky is only 23 and quickly improving. There's not much in the difference as shot stoppers, but Kinsky is already miles ahead on crosses and with the ball at his feet. He has the potential to become a top keeper, which Vicario will never become.I’m not surprised, writing was on the wall, but I think he’s the best keeper we have and I’m disappointed this is happening.
This thread reinforces what an unforgiving position goalkeeper is. Sullivan (I believe he won Spurs player of the year one time) and Gomes had periods of brilliance. But both of them lost confidence and consistency. If you saw them in the latter periods you would label them hopeless, but in the former, brilliant.
Why it is hard to view anyone as better than Jennings is that he was so consistently top drawer. I remember the Brazilian coach at the World Cup highlighting how good he was then, and he was 41! A quick look brought up this article at the time https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-06-12-sp-10076-story.html
As to Vicario, in the modern era his weaknesses (kicking, strength in the 6 yard area) were exposed. And then you have the mistake against Fulham! All goalkeepers make mistakes, even the great Jennings, but that was embarrassing.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.