• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Israel Gaza

LutonSpurs said:
BBC News - Israeli troops kill two Palestinians after they appear to surrender
www.bbc.com

West Bank: Israeli troops kill two Palestinians after they appear to surrender

The Palestinian Authority says the killings are a "war crime", while an Israeli minister backed the soldiers.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com

So justify this @scaramanga
Click to expand...
clearly Israel has questions to answer from the article it's cold blooded murder.

The problem is they might be connected to a terror network & that's all the justification Israeli soldiers need.
 
Last edited:
LutonSpurs said:
They occupy the West Bank. Like Russia occupy Ukraine. You know that. But you don't deal with truth Scara. We know that.
Click to expand...
Have a read up on the Oslo accords. The PLO agreed that Israel run the security for those areas. Are you saying that someone forged the signatures and the videos? Or that the PLO didn't have the right to agree that?
 
ricky2tricky4city said:
Yes that's very serious 😐

What are they thinking of charging him with? It can't be that complicated, yet we're 9months down the line.
Click to expand...
It's not the prosecution that's the problem.

Initially the kids lawyer wanted time to discuss a plea deal. Then after a while the kid's family wanted to change the lawyer. The new lawyer had asked for time to review the case.

The Israeli system is different from ours. You don't get immediately charged, that happens at the start of the court case. At the moment the kid is in the equivalent of being on remand.
 
kb 1984 said:
clearly Israel has questions to answer from the article it's cold blooded murder.

The problem is they might be connected to a terror network & that's all the justification Israeli soldiers need.
Click to expand...

They might not be. Which means their lives are worth something. Fundamentally, the IDF see Palestinian life as nothing.
 
scaramanga said:
It's not the prosecution that's the problem.

Initially the kids lawyer wanted time to discuss a plea deal. Then after a while the kid's family wanted to change the lawyer. The new lawyer had asked for time to review the case.

The Israeli system is different from ours. You don't get immediately charged, that happens at the start of the court case. At the moment the kid is in the equivalent of being on remand.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure how you discuss a plea deal without knowing what you are charged with?

So they are gathering evidence to formulate a charge? It sounds a really complicated case. Could take years, this one.

Either/or sounds like a prosecution problem.
 
ricky2tricky4city said:
I'm not sure how you discuss a plea deal without knowing what you are charged with?

So they are gathering evidence to formulate a charge? It sounds a really complicated case. Could take years, this one.

Either/or sounds like a prosecution problem.
Click to expand...

It sounds like a violation of a child's human rights. Any where else in the world and Scara would not be reaching for the stars to justify what he can see is wrong. His Israel position makes him a laughing stock as he takes such idealistic positions elsewhere but all credibility dies on this.
 
scaramanga said:
Sure, as soon as we see the footage of what happened inside the building.

Half truths and twisted truths.......
Click to expand...

Nothing, they seemingly wanted them onsite to kill them so it looked like something else.

BTW you asked

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
ricky2tricky4city said:
I'm not sure how you discuss a plea deal without knowing what you are charged with?

So they are gathering evidence to formulate a charge? It sounds a really complicated case. Could take years, this one.

Either/or sounds like a prosecution problem.
Click to expand...
He's accused of throwing rocks at moving vehicles. That has a defined sentence, so the defence knows what they're up against.

He will be formally charged in court, that's just how it works there. Nothing else is different for the defence. They know what they have to argue, they know what evidence they're facing. It's just a procedural difference that the charging happens in court. Despite that, you'll see a lot of shrieking antisemites shouting about how they've held him without charging him. That's nonsense.

They're not gathering evidence at all, they're waiting for the defence to decide what they're going to do. I assume the defence has decided to fight as he's due in court any day now.
 
Grays_1890 said:
Nothing, they seemingly wanted them onsite to kill them so it looked like something else.

BTW you asked

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...
What's in the building? A gun? A grenade? A tunnel? If they're surrendering, why are they still moving away?

You're making an accusation on a tiny proportion of the evidence. Don't let the retards drag you into their propaganda war.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back