As far as i am concerned if we sign Ade and his basic wage fits into our wage structure BUT we are giving him money too some other way....then we have broken our wage structure to all intents and purposes.....No?
I thought the principle was no player gets more than x amount per week and thats that. If he's getting a lump sum or ongoing payments or whatever else then to all intents and purposes whats to stop any other player saying i want the same or i am off?
I am not arguing if he is worth it or not, just the basic principle of our wage structure is either already broken or very soon will be.
Long term i think the ONLY way football will stay viable will be with some kind of basic + performance related pay. With the various stat companies around now you can analyse virtually every aspect of a players performance and you could give it a financial worth so i think and hope this happens.
A brick version of what i mean would be to take the average rating from x sources out of 10 for each player as 50% of the decision and 50% fan votes.
Ie player A is on a basic of 40,000e a week regardless. If his performance is rated/voted as a 7 out of 10 he gets 45,000e, 8 out of 10 then 50,000e, 9 out of 10 and he gets 55,000e (just to give an idea).
I don't think it would be too hard to truly measure a performance on a pitch using various methods to judge a sporting performance/contribution. Obviously it wouldn't be just goals scored as you might encourage selfishness on goal, or distance covered as players might just "run around a lot" without actually doing anything to affect the result. Neither could it be just fan votes, as we all have our favoured/hated players.
Anybody see what i mean here?
Edit: this of course wouldn't stop big spending clubs from saying "publically you are on this performance pay nonsense but in reality we will still sling you whatever it takes to get you up to 250kk a week
"