Dressing room poison though isnt he?Would Garnacho be worthwhile?
Ticks the HG criteria, works hard and can play right side or left side.
Seems to be holding on for Chelsea but if we can get him for £40m or loan then I think we could do a lot worse.
Not sure GB, good player imo.Dressing room poison though isnt he?
He doesn’t know either.Not sure GB, good player imo.
He's not better than anything we got already, and we're not short of association trained players. We need club trained player to fill up the UEFA quota.Would Garnacho be worthwhile?
Ticks the HG criteria, works hard and can play right side or left side.
Seems to be holding on for Chelsea but if we can get him for £40m or loan then I think we could do a lot worse.
I think scenarios like that are just dreamt up on football forums to be honest
What if we don't want him (know he won't come) and just trying to get Real to buy him so we can get Savinho?
Maybe the Biss sale has put an extra £10m in our coffers to enable this?
What if we don't want him (know he won't come) and just trying to get Real to buy him so we can get Savinho?
Transfers don't really work like that. You can finance a transfer over years, realistically up to the length of the players contract, but then that means you've got less in the coffers for each year. What i'm saying is we don't likely need player sales to go through to put an extra £10m on the table as £10m over 3-5 years is relative peanutsMaybe the Biss sale has put an extra £10m in our coffers to enable this?
We might have set a notional figure though, say £150m plus sales. And under that self imposed fiscal rule, Biss going allows us to meet both City and Como's magic figures?Transfers don't really work like that. You can finance a transfer over years, realistically up to the length of the players contract, but then that means you've got less in the coffers for each year. What i'm saying is we don't likely need player sales to go through to put an extra £10m on the table as £10m over 3-5 years is relative peanuts
I think its more a squad structure (foreign v home grown blah blah) and wages thing rather than a transfer fee thing.We might have set a notional figure though, say £150m plus sales. And under that self imposed fiscal rule, Biss going allows us to meet both City and Como's magic figures?