• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Sick sick world what is wrong with people

kb 1984 said:
You are an ice agent & know all there protocols well done. I call flimflam if you are a policeman have you ever walked the beat or dealt with harden criminals. I ask because my old man worked at Hornsey nick all his life.joined at 18 retired at 57 even he would agree that was murder.
Click to expand...

One whatsapp to my mate this morning and he said the incident wouldn't meet the threshold here and it would be massively unlikely the police would be armed anyway.
 
MartyFunkhouser said:
You know that was the woman outside the car, not the driver, filming on a mobile phone? I can grab that video for you and make you look stupid???

She also said "go get your lunch" or something equally threatening. Ohhh The horror

FFS, if this is the threshold for shooting people, a Karen with a phone and someone spooked in a car who was previously waving ICE agents through, then GHod help us.
Click to expand...
The point wasn't about the threshold for shooting something. The point was that these women weren't there peacefully minding their own business. They went there to confront and disrupt the agents and they were being aggressive and confrontational. The situation escalates from there rapidly.
 
kb 1984 said:
On the evening of the shooting, Kaba was driving a car that officers believed was linked to a "firearms incident" the previous day. The police stopped the car, and armed police then approached on foot. Kaba then rammed an unmarked police vehicle. An armed officer fired a single round at Kaba through the car windscreen. Kaba was taken to hospital but died of his injuries. Which bit is wrong & how does it relate to what happened in the states

You are an ice agent & know all there protocols well done. I call flimflam if you are a policeman have you ever walked the beat or dealt with harden criminals. I ask because my old man worked at Hornsey nick all his life.joined at 18 retired at 57 even he would agree that was murder.
Click to expand...
You said they were looking for Kaba and believed him to be armed. They weren't and they didn't. In terms of "ramming a police car" matter of interpretation - his car moved very slowly. The point was the moment he moves the vehicle following command to get out justified the shooting in the eyes of the law.
 
Silly McSilly Face said:
The point wasn't about the threshold for shooting something. The point was that these women weren't there peacefully minding their own business. They went there to confront and disrupt the agents and they were being aggressive and confrontational. The situation escalates from there rapidly.
Click to expand...

No you attributed a comment to the driver which was not the case, I am not the only one who spotted that

And if a woman with a mobile is a threat to say "go get your lunch" then mate, sorry, thats weak as p1ss
 
Silly McSilly Face said:
You said they were looking for Kaba and believed him to be armed. They weren't and they didn't.
Click to expand...
& I have corrected my error it still doesn't relate to what happened in the states does it.

So do you know ice protocols & have you been a policeman dealing with harden criminals on a daily basis
 
Last edited:
MartyFunkhouser said:
No you attributed a comment to the driver which was not the case, I am not the only one who spotted that

And if a woman with a mobile is a threat to say "go get your lunch" then mate, sorry, thats weak as p1ss
Click to expand...
you are really struggling with sticking to the facts in this conversation. This is exactly what i said screenshotted from the post you can find yourself
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260110_110901_Samsung Internet.jpg
    Screenshot_20260110_110901_Samsung Internet.jpg
    159.8 KB · Views: 6
kb 1984 said:
& I have corrected my error it still doesn't relate to what happened in the states does it.
Click to expand...

And that doesn't take away from the fact that the car was known to the police, was suspected to have been used in a firearms incident previously and I suspect (I have not read the report fully), the armed police were present because of an operation which had located the car and was required given the nature of what it was linked to.

But yeh, its the same anyway
 
Gilzeantoscore said:
Clearly these goons cannot tell their left from their right. The murderer was standing to the left of the car, but the driver turns to the right, away from him. So where was the threat to his safety again?
Click to expand...
Moving vehicle is a threat to your safety. You don't know the intention can easily reverse rapidly over you having turned away. Person in charge of a vehicle thats refused to follow commands and is setting off is a significant threat. In confrontation between person on foot with a gun and person with an SUV i'd take the car all day long.
 
Silly McSilly Face said:
you are really struggling with sticking to the facts in this conversation. This is exactly what i said screenshotted from the post you can find yourself
Click to expand...

Haha get fcuked am I struggling

My post:

1768043722785.png

Your response, in isolation:

1768043741519.png

Thats literally trying to attribute comments she didn't make to her, or at worse you are being massive disingenuous

If you worked as a forensic detective with that level or lack of attention to detail then I am Isambard Kingdom Brunel
 
Last edited:
MartyFunkhouser said:
Haha get fcuked am I struggling

My post:

View attachment 21210

Your response, in isolation:

View attachment 21211

Thats literally trying to attribute comments she didn't make to her

If you worked as a forensic detective with that level or lack of attention to detail then I am Isambard Kingdom Brunel
Click to expand...
My response was a screen shot from the BBC with the exact words for clarity. I never attributed them to the driver.
 
Silly McSilly Face said:
Moving vehicle is a threat to your safety. You don't know the intention can easily reverse rapidly over you having turned away. Person in charge of a vehicle thats refused to follow commands and is setting off is a significant threat. In confrontation between person on foot with a gun and person with an SUV i'd take the car all day long.
Click to expand...
Ha, ha. My 93 year old grannie could have avoided that car. In fact watch the tape he got out of the way. What crap are you talking about? Justifying state sanctioned murder, you are a disgrace!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back