Nicolas Jackson

[Ace Face]

If we signed Jackson it would be £60M+ and we wouldn’t sign another #9. It’s a no for me.

In that case same for me too

 

[Lemonade Money]

I wasn’t suggesting that we are. I was just trying to emphasise the point that those in the game value highly the ability of a player to get into positions to have goalscoring chances.

So why doesn't Alonso value that if he's for sale?

 

[Aldo]

Chelsea value him at £65m … the same value that Galatasaray have put on Osimhen.

 

[MartyFunkhouser]

So why doesn't Alonso value that if he's for sale?

Could be he values other stylistic and tactics metrics? You see it all the time, managers like certain players stylistically, not everyone wants the same.

He has positives and downsides for me, he clearly gets goals, quick and great on counter, bad is his touch is horrific

 

[Kandi1977]

Chelsea value him at £65m … the same value that Galatasaray have put on Osimhen.

Osimhen's salary is 350% more than Jackson.

 

[RunTMC]

Could be he values other stylistic and tactics metrics? You see it all the time, managers like certain players stylistically, not everyone wants the same.

He has positives and downsides for me, he clearly gets goals, quick and great on counter, bad is his touch is horrific

Personally i think one of the main reasons they're selling him is because he's a saleable asset that will bring in a big fee. They need to cover all this cash they've been splashing around

 

[Lemonade Money]

Could be he values other stylistic and tactics metrics? You see it all the time, managers like certain players stylistically, not everyone wants the same.

He has positives and downsides for me, he clearly gets goals, quick and great on counter, bad is his touch is horrific

I guess I'm just bored of buying other (good) teams cast-offs. I want us to buy players on the way up, not gamble on players on the way down.

 

[Bishop]

Could be he values other stylistic and tactics metrics? You see it all the time, managers like certain players stylistically, not everyone wants the same.

He has positives and downsides for me, he clearly gets goals, quick and great on counter, bad is his touch is horrific

I think calling his touch horrific is a bit inaccurate. I'd say his touch is inconsistent. At times the ball bounces off him and he looks rather clumsy at other times his touch is very soft and he moves and links it really well.

 

[MartyFunkhouser]

I guess I'm just bored of buying other (good) teams cast-offs. I want us to buy players on the way up, not gamble on players on the way down.

Yeh, similar thoughts, just offering a different perspective

 

[MartyFunkhouser]

I think calling his touch horrific is a bit inaccurate. I'd say his touch is inconsistent. At times the ball bounces off him and he looks rather clumsy at other times his touch is very soft and he moves and links it really well.

So he is paulo wanchope

 

[Bishop]

I guess I'm just bored of buying other (good) teams cast-offs. I want us to buy players on the way up, not gamble on players on the way down.

I wouldn't say Jackson is on the way down, he's kind of neutral, neither on the wane nor neccesarily on the upward curve.

 

[Bishop]

So he is paulo wanchope

Lol yeah that's actually a fairly decent comparison.