-
Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara
Lucas Bergvall
- Thread starter Denmark Spur
- Start date
MartyFunkhouser
Vic Buckingham
I think we over play it TBH, its an alpha sport/industry where negotiations are key. People will act in their own interests and are allowed to, in fact I take my hat off slightly to anyone that does, even to our detriment, because thats what they should be doing for their club. No club should be rolling over after a belly rub because its good old Spurs and neither should we.
Bishop
Paul Walsh
Its business, take the emotion out of it. If they want something we have and are prepared to pay the take their money.
Bishop
Paul Walsh
I'd take the right now because I don't know if I believe either will actually get to the level that has been suggested (more so Bergvall). Vuskovic I honestly just haven't watched enough to really judge, but I just note most of the hype in relation to him comes from the goals he scores rather than the defending he does.
robp135
Steed Malbranque
Whatever our saviour wants.
Worth understanding that in the PSR era it’s more about the profit you make from a transfer fee than the actual amount. As an example if we sold Solanke now for £30M its basically a zero gain form a PSR perspective. But Bergvall & Vuskovic will be 90% profit.
Ace Face
Terry Yorath
Take the money.
Neither came through the academy so my connection to both is limited. Plus there is no certainty that either will fulfill the potential we fans have assigned them. They would need to be Hoddle or King mk.2 to do that and it’s almost guaranteed they won’t hit those heights.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Get the £100m from selling Danso, Bentancur and Solanke instead
We need to open the pathways and you do that by having Vuskovic 4th CB, Bergvall 4th CM and Lanshear 2nd CF
robp135
Steed Malbranque
We would struggle to get £65M from those 3. But it also has to take in to consideration the amortization for PSR.
Danso cost us about £25M when you include the loan fee. We would still have £15M on the books for him. So if we sold him for £30M it would only be £15M profit.
Solanke was about £55M and we still have £33M on the book. We would struggle to get much more than that for him. Bentancur would be mostly profit now. But you are looking at maybe £25M you could actually go out and spend.
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Sell some more Klimt and Bacon then too
robp135
Steed Malbranque
Gutter Boy
Tim Sherwood
Johnston and Lewis raised £200m last week by flogging some paintings, including some by Klimt and Francis Bacon. They were short on cash, so its whats paying for Tonali and Fernandes
robp135
Steed Malbranque
Don’t think it is tbh.
But either way. Thats not really all that relevant to PSR. We need to be selling players that have been at the club for 4+ seasons or for significantly more than we paid for them.
Gallagher, Tel, Danso, Odobert, Maddison, Kulusevski, Dragusin, Vicario. We sell any of these were not really getting much out of it at this point. That’s not to say we shouldn’t. But its not raising major funds to reinvest.