I'm really not worried given a week to prep Jose will use same tactics as vs Wolves.
The energy of Wolves performance is what was hard to cope with, I don't see another team matching that over 90 mins
The performance from Wolves was part of it. A big part I think was also the players we had available and how the game developed. We got the first goal (from a very limited chance and fantastic strike). With Dier and Sissoko centrally, Sanchez at CB we were very limited in our ability to play through pressure.I'm really not worried given a week to prep Jose will use same tactics as vs Wolves.
The energy of Wolves performance is what was hard to cope with, I don't see another team matching that over 90 mins
It wasn't just their energy in midfield it was also the quality of their play to go with it. Chelsea are also capable of putting together stretches of good play in the midfield. Again I'm not saying they will, but we need to be wary of going for the same approach as it will cost us against opposition who are both dominant in midfield and have quality forward players. Chelsea are closer to that definition than Wolves.I'm really not worried given a week to prep Jose will use same tactics as vs Wolves.
The energy of Wolves performance is what was hard to cope with, I don't see another team matching that over 90 mins
I don’t think soBetween the three of them they would likely dominate midfield, which means their forwards will have a good day...
Their forwards are a bit flakey/hit and miss, but they have quality
I think injury has played a part
Midfield is a conundrum for us, against Chelsea I’d probably go with Dier and Winks if fit.
as mentioned though it could be advantageous for us for them to have possession and push on so we can hurt them on the counter.
I say we should stick with Dier and Sissoko. We just look like defensive wrecks with Winks in there - at the very least, Sissoko uses his superior mobility and physicality to better effect.
Once Ndombele is fit, start him alongside Dier. Then look for a permanent DM to challenge Dier in January.
That's my three-step proposal.
Probably already been done to death, not sure why we didn’t go in serious for Tielemans...missed a trick there methinks.
Poch said no. Same as James Maddison
Probably already been done to death, not sure why we didn’t go in serious for Tielemans...missed a trick there methinks.
https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/tottenham-news-harry-kane-jose-mourinho-mauricio-pochettino-difference-1343272
'It's good to experience new things': Harry Kane on Tottenham's new lease of life under Jose Mourinho
Spurs striker full of praise for new manager's impact on training ground and says squad are determined to beat Chelsea this weekend
Harry Kane admits he is learning a new winning meteorology under Jose Mourinho at Tottenham Hotspur.
Tottenham ground out a 2-1 win away to Wolves on Sunday with a stoppage-time winner from Jan Vertonghen after being under pressure for most of the game.
“It is hard to say. I got on very well with 'Poch' and I respect him very much,” said Kane.
Harry Kane said:Chelsea is a big one – a chance for us to get into that top four and push on from there.
If we can win that, we have fixtures over the Christmas period we feel we can definitely win.
But I don't want to say anything now and lose next weekend
So in a nutshell the MouMou masterplan is to play a low block with Dier and Sissoko... restrict the opposition to having difficult attempts at goal, then when we get the ball we whack it forwards quickly to our Fab Four up front, before their defence get settled.
Whereas Poch would try to get control of the game and pass pass pass push push push pass pass pass.
I think its too soon to call.
Right now I think Mourinho is doing what is easiest to implement and get results with.
Given the nature of the squad I dont think a low block approach will suit long term.
I suspect more a 4-2-3-1 in classic Poch style (Wanyama sitting/splitting CBs/Dembele roaming/high full backs)
At least in shape if not execution. Mourinho is more "efficient" in these things than Poch, IMO. He's happier for a long ball if it gets it up there, hes happier with turning over play - 3 direct passes -shot.
Poch seemed to have a more holistic approach. Id say thats probably the biggest difference in terms of style.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.