• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Gutter Boy said:
Levy had some credentials. He'd run his own company (Blue Inc) and had worked in football (Rangers, AEK, Slavia)

Silverton and Lewis have never had a day job between them. They are yacht club yah yahs who have spent their entire gilded lives regatta-ing with the Epstein class
Click to expand...
I'm talking about the criticism of Lange and Vinai. For me the Lewis' are ethe same as they have always been until the prove otherwise.
 
Bishop said:
The new leaders need to earn respect, absolutely. But they are eight months into cleaning up a massive inherited mess. It’s completely hypocritical to demand immediate perfection from them while giving the person who actually caused the chaos a free pass.

Btw I'm not excusing ENIC at all, I'm ENIC out more than I am Levy out but I don't like hypocrisy when I see it and will call out out.
Click to expand...

I don't think there's a demand for perfection, there's a pretty big gap between that and being where we are. They need to ride out the ill feeling and prove they know what they are doing. As I said they are the ones who made the change when they did, having conducted a review - the fruits of which (and subsequent decisions appointing Vinai, promoting Lange, losing Paratici, appointing Frank then Tudor then RDZ) almost resulted in relegation - yes Levy shares in that blame but plenty of their decisions had a more direct impact imv
 
billyiddo said:
I don't think there's a demand for perfection, there's a pretty big gap between that and being where we are. They need to ride out the ill feeling and prove they know what they are doing. As I said they are the ones who made the change when they did, having conducted a review - the fruits of which (and subsequent decisions appointing Vinai, promoting Lange, losing Paratici, appointing Frank then Tudor then RDZ) almost resulted in relegation - yes Levy shares in that blame but plenty of their decisions had a more direct impact imv
Click to expand...
Where we differ is that I see this season as a culmination of season after season of poor decision making. Yes they aren't blameless for how it went but they were just the proverbial nail in the coffin rather (I'm mostly referring to Lange and Vinai) than the coffin makers themselves.
 
thfcsteff said:
I have heard a different set of details around the Eze deal, however the end result appears to have been that Daniel did (indeed) try to reconfigure the oiriginally-agreed deal. Had Havaertz not been injured, Eze would not have gone to the Goons from all I've heard.




We only loosened the wage structure mid-season as I understand it.





I would agree this was part of the final countdown however there's more, of that I'm sure. What I'm not sure is whether we'll hear that. I think everyone should move on from it TBH because what's done is done.




Again, I have a feeling none of us want to know the full details. I really don't think I do. The whispers I've heard are quite enough. I want to look forward now...

(obviously I mean all of us in general, me included!)
Click to expand...

Well now I absolutely want to hear more of the details! 😂

On the wage structure, was Simons not brought in on higher wages than most other previous signings? It certainly felt like we were moving with more intent last summer, trying to do things earlier and playing in a field with clubs we usually didn’t want to go head to head with.
 
metalgear said:
some unreliable details here if you care

www.spurs-web.com

Tottenham wage bill comparison: Spurs fall behind Aston Villa in Premier League table

Tottenham's wage bill has grown over the last few years, but the data clearly points to a major issue compared to Premier League rivals.
www.spurs-web.com www.spurs-web.com

View attachment 22492
Click to expand...

Wages (are) currently irrelevant, red herring brick. We have no elite/WC players that should be earning more than 200-250K/week, proven out by their performances. Add in the number of under 25 players and that's the story.

There will be very few players that deserve more than our previous (since it's supposedly gone) cap that we can attract (if they deserve that money they will likely have bigger clubs in for them). We didn't lose out on any players due to wages in last few seasons.

If in the future we have another Kane/Son scenario or a special player that actually wants to come, it will get tested. The only real thing the total wages bill highlights now is my first point, we don't have enough quality in squad (the actual problem) to justify a higher wage bill.
 
Gutter Boy said:
They are Bahamians. Is that very different from Americans? They are just absentee owners who only care about their trust fund top-ups.
Click to expand...

I suggest you look at United, Chelsea and Private Equity in general.

The goal of American PE ownership in business is not for the business to be successful product wise or to make money (yes, I know it makes no sense initially).

They will purchase something with leveraged capital, they will cut costs/asset strip over time (make product significantly worse), they will pay themselves huge management/consultant/administrative fees (this is how they make money) over a long period of time, then eventually the business will collapse (PE has 10X the bankruptcy rate of a normal LLC/LTD) and they will declare bankruptcy/administration and they walk away and do it again somewhere else. If you want a proven example look at the story of Toys R Us.

They need to stay to fudge away from us.
 
SissokoWasGood (BoL) said:
Well now I absolutely want to hear more of the details! 😂

On the wage structure, was Simons not brought in on higher wages than most other previous signings? It certainly felt like we were moving with more intent last summer, trying to do things earlier and playing in a field with clubs we usually didn’t want to go head to head with.
Click to expand...
The cap has always been a percentage. It has always been approx 42-44% of turnover. Adebayor was on £200k a season during his loan year IIRC, so it never been about individual salaries. With Kane, Son and Lloris all going in quite quick succession, we cleared out our highest earners. So we should have quite a lot of leeway even under the existing cap
 
thfcsteff said:
That there has been something wrong with our club is clear. I believe you and I would both tab that back to the 2019 season when awful decisions were made which have impacted us horrendously since. That change needed to come is beyond dispute. How that change needed to be applied is where I question (wholly) the wisdom of making a change of such magnitude at a time like that. I'll politely bet you in return that the players and coaches were destabilized; it's not like there were strong, reassuring personalities to tell them the plan.

I think what always made our situation with Levy unique was that he was the door, the lock, and the key. He had full master control. And to axe that overnight and institute a whole new way of working during a season is huge.

Ironically, we could yet benefit from how that all played out. The new structure is that much closer to being fully bedded in, we have somehow landed with a manager who may very well be our new 'Poch', and we survived. Now we have to see what lessons have been learned. This is a massive last-chance saloon shot IMO to really get it right on the footballing side. FWIW I always felt Lange would not survive in his post but Venkatesham would. Let's see if it plays out.
Click to expand...
Did you watch the amazon documentary? If so did you really take that away from it?
 
DubaiSpur said:
Thanks for sharing mate.

Again, all the right stuff, but I'd rephrase the last sentence to say, their words in particular are worthless.

Levy is gone. The ills he was responsible for are now your responsibility. You only get to blame him for your own incompetence once.

This club deserves owners with ambitions to win on the pitch - that requires major investment, acumen, and picking the right people to run it.

ENIC have failed at the first two and for the third, their idea of experts is apparently Johan Lange, glorified youth scout, and Vinai Venkatesham, the CEO ChatGPT would generate.

ENIC are on thin ice and this summer will be the litmus test of all their blathering. Suffice to say, I'm not optimistic.
Click to expand...
Wasn't Lange appointed when Levy was still the chief exec? Also what do you think is bad about Vinai? I find it strange that you think you can judge a CEO after he has had control for only around 6 months. Let's give him at least a couple of years before we decide on him..... after all - we gave Levy a quarter of a century.
 
DTA said:
This is revisionist bullsħit. levy did NOT have 24 years of failure. Look where we were when he came in and where we were for the majority of his time here.

Post Poch he made some bad decisions no doubt. But to dress that up as equalling 24 years of failure is Bollócks
Click to expand...
Indeed. He did some great stuff, he then badly mucked things up. See my comparison to Blackberry a few pages ago.... Would you want a Blackberry now?
 
Gutter Boy said:
Levy had some credentials. He'd run his own company (Blue Inc) and had worked in football (Rangers, AEK, Slavia)

Silverton and Lewis have never had a day job between them. They are yacht club yah yahs who have spent their entire gilded lives regatta-ing with the Epstein class
Click to expand...
Which is why they have appointed a very good CEO with good experience at a club who are bigger than we are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back